These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20463693)

  • 1. Scientists' turn to win votes.
    Nature; 2010 May; 465(7295):135. PubMed ID: 20463693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Planning for US science policy in 2009.
    Kalil T
    Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7113):751-2. PubMed ID: 17051190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. US scientists protest cuts to research funding that aim to reduce national deficit.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2012 Nov; 345():e8101. PubMed ID: 23190913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Italian election leaves science out in the cold.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7693):411-412. PubMed ID: 29469119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. UK scientists fear further cuts.
    Cressey D
    Nature; 2013 Jun; 498(7453):151. PubMed ID: 23765471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What Boris Johnson's leadership could mean for science.
    Else H
    Nature; 2019 Aug; 572(7767):13-14. PubMed ID: 31363191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Communication breakdown.
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7545):5. PubMed ID: 25832368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Australian scientists protest at loss of funding board.
    Dennis C
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7050):451. PubMed ID: 16049440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. UK election: Upstart parties set out science plans.
    Gibney E; Cressey D
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7545):16-7. PubMed ID: 25832385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Science and innovation policies for Donald Trump.
    Sarewitz D
    Nature; 2016 Nov; 539(7629):331. PubMed ID: 27853232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The scientists who support Donald Trump.
    Reardon S
    Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7625):298-299. PubMed ID: 27762392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High stakes for science in UK election.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7293):1254-5. PubMed ID: 20428132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Where science and nonsense collide.
    Kornblihtt A
    Nature; 2017 Jan; 541(7636):135. PubMed ID: 28079100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What Pakistan's new government means for science.
    Masood E
    Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7719):419. PubMed ID: 30131533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hungary rewards highly cited scientists with bonus grants.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2017 Nov; 551(7681):425-426. PubMed ID: 29168828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What the UK election means for science.
    Gibney E
    Nature; 2015 May; 521(7551):134. PubMed ID: 25971484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. US science policy: mission impossible?
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):250-1. PubMed ID: 15029165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. UK election dashes scientists' hopes of staying in the EU.
    O'Callaghan J
    Nature; 2019 Dec; 576(7787):345-346. PubMed ID: 31848481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What Thailand's long-awaited election could mean for science.
    Mallapaty S
    Nature; 2019 Apr; 568(7750):13-14. PubMed ID: 30940960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A state of flux.
    Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7113):724. PubMed ID: 17051167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.