297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20464460)
1. Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method.
Sarot JR; Contar CM; Cruz AC; de Souza Magini R
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2010 Jul; 21(7):2079-85. PubMed ID: 20464460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone.
Schwitalla AD; Abou-Emara M; Spintig T; Lackmann J; Müller WD
J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25435385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants.
Lee WT; Koak JY; Lim YJ; Kim SK; Kwon HB; Kim MJ
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2012 May; 100(4):1044-52. PubMed ID: 22331553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of titanium and Cfr-peek additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) on maxilla.
Altıparmak N; Polat S; Onat S
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 124(1S):101290. PubMed ID: 36152972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK in implant dentistry: A scoping review on the finite element method.
Souza JCM; Pinho SS; Braz MP; Silva FS; Henriques B
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Sep; 24(12):1355-1367. PubMed ID: 33616450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical analyses of one-piece dental implants composed of titanium, zirconia, PEEK, CFR-PEEK, or GFR-PEEK: Stresses, strains, and bone remodeling prediction by the finite element method.
Fabris D; Moura JPA; Fredel MC; Souza JCM; Silva FS; Henriques B
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2022 Jan; 110(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 34173713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature.
Schwitalla A; Müller WD
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Dec; 39(6):743-9. PubMed ID: 21905892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone as a dental implant material in implant-supported overdenture under mandibular trauma: A finite element analysis study.
Bilginaylar K; Ayali A
Niger J Clin Pract; 2023 Oct; 26(10):1538-1546. PubMed ID: 37929532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical Effects of Titanium and Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK as Dental Implant Material: A Finite Element Analysis.
Ediboğlu E; Akdeniz SS; Beyler E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Jun; 0(0):1-17. PubMed ID: 38941169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element evaluation to compare stress pattern in bone surrounding implant with carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone and commercially pure titanium implants.
Haseeb SA; K C V; Vijaykumar N; Sree Durga B A; Kumar AS; M K S
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2022; 13(2):243-247. PubMed ID: 36051812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perturbation effects of the carbon fiber-PEEK screws on radiotherapy dose distribution.
Nevelsky A; Borzov E; Daniel S; Bar-Deroma R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):62-68. PubMed ID: 28300369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploring the bio-mechanical behavior of PEEK and CFR-PEEK materials for dental implant applications using finite element analysis.
Reddy KUK; Seth A; Vuppuluri A; Verma PC; Narala SKR; Babu PJ; Saravanan P
J Prosthodont Res; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38777753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhancement of surface bioactivity on carbon fiber-reinforced polyether ether ketone via graphene modification.
Yan JH; Wang CH; Li KW; Zhang Q; Yang M; Di-Wu WL; Yan M; Song Y; Ba JJ; Bi L; Han YS
Int J Nanomedicine; 2018; 13():3425-3440. PubMed ID: 29942128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of different biocompatible implant materials on the mechanical stability of dental implants under excessive oblique load.
Bataineh K; Al Janaideh M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1206-1217. PubMed ID: 31670872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inflammatory tissue response in human soft tissue is caused by a higher particle load near carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK compared to titanium plates.
Fleischhacker E; Sprecher CM; Milz S; Saller MM; Wirz R; Zboray R; Parrilli A; Gleich J; Siebenbürger G; Böcker W; Ockert B; Helfen T
Acta Biomater; 2024 May; 180():128-139. PubMed ID: 38636789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dental implant and abutment in PEEK: stress assessment in single crown retainers on anterior region.
de Almeida MVR; Ribeiro MCO; Dos Reis-Neta GR; Vargas-Moreno VF; Gomes RS; da Silva WJ; Del Bel Cury AA; Marcello-Machado RM
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):336. PubMed ID: 38795258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the use of PEEK material in implant-supported fixed restorations by finite element analysis.
Tekin S; Değer Y; Demirci F
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1252-1258. PubMed ID: 31489862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the advantages of CFR-PEEK over titanium spinal stabilization implants in proton therapy-a phantom study.
Poel R; Belosi F; Albertini F; Walser M; Gisep A; Lomax AJ; Weber DC
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245031. PubMed ID: 32315991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis.
Tretto PHW; Dos Santos MBF; Spazzin AO; Pereira GKR; Bacchi A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jun; 23(8):372-383. PubMed ID: 32116034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
