These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20464853)
1. Comparative effectiveness. Federal government's push for more data to benefit supply chain. Aston G Mater Manag Health Care; 2010 Apr; 19(4):22-5. PubMed ID: 20464853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of recent federal spending on comparative effectiveness research: priorities, gaps, and next steps. Benner JS; Morrison MR; Karnes EK; Kocot SL; McClellan M Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Oct; 29(10):1768-76. PubMed ID: 20921474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How the Recovery Act's Federal Coordinating Council paved the way for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Conway PH Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Nov; 29(11):2091-7. PubMed ID: 20923814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Making the top-tech list. DerGurahian J Mod Healthc; 2009 Jul; 39(29):26-8. PubMed ID: 19658234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Standards in health care materiel management. Maher VF Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1992 May; 13(4):82-5. PubMed ID: 10117383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The supply chain and clinical quality. Runy LA Mater Manag Health Care; 2005 May; 14(5):21-6. PubMed ID: 16047455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Life expectancy projection benchmarks: a how-to guide for medical equipment replacement programs. McClain JP Healthc Facil Manag Ser; 1995 Sep; ():1-19. PubMed ID: 10157565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expanding on product and equipment evaluation procedures. Teselsky RP Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1981 May; 2(4):63-9. PubMed ID: 10309397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Worth the push. An ergonomics programs can save time and money. Carpenter D Mater Manag Health Care; 2002 Jan; 11(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 11828670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Materials management information systems. Health Devices; 1996; 25(2-3):48-100. PubMed ID: 8655344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical technology management in U.S. hospitals. Baretich MF Biomed Sci Instrum; 2002; 38():273-5. PubMed ID: 12085615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Product standardization/evaluation committees. Ryan P J Healthc Mater Manage; 1985; 3(5):28-35. PubMed ID: 10274841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolving role of supply chain management technology in healthcare. Langabeer J J Healthc Inf Manag; 2005; 19(2):27-33. PubMed ID: 15869210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results from our 1996 Product Committee Survey. Some win, some lose. Why? Souhrada L Mater Manag Health Care; 1996 Aug; 5(8):26-8, 30. PubMed ID: 10159559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]