175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20465080)
1. Where is the voice of the man the child will become?
Geisheker JV
J Clin Ethics; 2010; 21(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 20465080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Where is the child? Circumcision and custody in Boldt v. Boldt.
Dolgin JL
J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 19845197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Boldt v. Boldt.
Davis DS
J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19845196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Boldt v. Boldt: A pediatric ethics perspective.
Diekema DS
J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 19845198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of pediatric advance directives: a tool for palliative care physicians.
Zinner SE
Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2008 Dec-2009 Jan; 25(6):427-30. PubMed ID: 18812617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adolescent decisionmaking, part I: Introduction.
Hester DM
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2009; 18(3):300-2. PubMed ID: 19460232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Circumcision and the best interests of the child.
Forbes D
J Paediatr Child Health; 2015 Mar; 51(3):263-5. PubMed ID: 25758306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Infant male circumcision and the autonomy of the child: two ethical questions.
McMath A
J Med Ethics; 2015 Aug; 41(8):687-90. PubMed ID: 25710966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision.
Mazor J
J Med Ethics; 2013 Jul; 39(7):421-8. PubMed ID: 23698892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Going beyond parents and institutional review boards in protecting children involved in nontherapeutic research.
Rubinstein E
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2003; 33(2):251-94. PubMed ID: 15164740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Using bioethics discourse to determine when parents should make health care decisions for their children: is deference justified?
Rosato JL
Temple Law Rev; 2000; 73(1):1-68. PubMed ID: 12449931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Against the tide: arguments against respecting a minor's refusal of efficacious life-saving treatment.
Ross LF
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2009; 18(3):302-15; discussion 315-22. PubMed ID: 19460233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nontherapeutic circumcision is ethically bankrupt.
Hampton WF
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):W8. PubMed ID: 12859799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Children and adolescents' capacity to provide informed consent for participation in research.
Kuther TL; Posada M
Adv Psychol Res; 2004; 32():163-73. PubMed ID: 16986221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The competence of children: no longer all or none.
Gaylin W
Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Apr; 12(2):33-8. PubMed ID: 7096064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Male circumcision, religious preferences, and the question of harm.
Sheldon M
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 12859823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Standards for family decisions: replacing best interests with harm prevention.
Dresser R
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):54-5. PubMed ID: 12859819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Parental consent: its justification and limitations.
Langham P
Clin Res; 1979 Dec; 27(5):349-58. PubMed ID: 10244854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ancient rites and new laws: how should we regulate religious circumcision of minors?
Davis DS
J Med Ethics; 2013 Jul; 39(7):456-8. PubMed ID: 23698891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention.
Diekema DS
Theor Med Bioeth; 2004; 25(4):243-64. PubMed ID: 15637945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
