312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20465265)
21. Statistical identification of differentially labeled peptides from liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Cho H; Smalley DM; Theodorescu D; Ley K; Lee JK
Proteomics; 2007 Oct; 7(20):3681-92. PubMed ID: 17879999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. High-sensitivity analysis of specific peptides in complex samples by selected MS/MS ion monitoring and linear ion trap mass spectrometry: application to biological studies.
Jorge I; Casas EM; Villar M; Ortega-Pérez I; López-Ferrer D; Martínez-Ruiz A; Carrera M; Marina A; Martínez P; Serrano H; Cañas B; Were F; Gallardo JM; Lamas S; Redondo JM; García-Dorado D; Vázquez J
J Mass Spectrom; 2007 Nov; 42(11):1391-403. PubMed ID: 17960563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Protein labeling by iTRAQ: a new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research.
Wiese S; Reidegeld KA; Meyer HE; Warscheid B
Proteomics; 2007 Feb; 7(3):340-50. PubMed ID: 17177251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Differential dimethyl labeling of N-termini of peptides after guanidination for proteome analysis.
Ji C; Guo N; Li L
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(6):2099-108. PubMed ID: 16335955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analytical characteristics of cleavable isotope-coded affinity tag-LC-tandem mass spectrometry for quantitative proteomic studies.
Vaughn CP; Crockett DK; Lim MS; Elenitoba-Johnson KS
J Mol Diagn; 2006 Sep; 8(4):513-20. PubMed ID: 16931593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Production of 18O-single labeled peptide fragments during trypsin digestion of proteins for quantitative proteomics using nanoLC-ESI-MS/MS.
Mori M; Abe K; Yamaguchi H; Goto J; Shimada M; Mano N
J Proteome Res; 2010 Jul; 9(7):3741-9. PubMed ID: 20496949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Targeted comparative proteomics by liquid chromatography/matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry.
Melanson JE; Chisholm KA; Pinto DM
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2006; 20(5):904-10. PubMed ID: 16470697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of membrane fraction proteomic profiles of normal and cancerous human colorectal tissues with gel-assisted digestion and iTRAQ labeling mass spectrometry.
Chen JS; Chen KT; Fan CW; Han CL; Chen YJ; Yu JS; Chang YS; Chien CW; Wu CP; Hung RP; Chan EC
FEBS J; 2010 Jul; 277(14):3028-38. PubMed ID: 20546304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing biological variation and protein processing in primary human leukocytes by automated multiplex stable isotope labeling coupled to 2 dimensional peptide separation.
Raijmakers R; Heck AJ; Mohammed S
Mol Biosyst; 2009 Sep; 5(9):992-1003. PubMed ID: 19668865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. ICPLQuant - A software for non-isobaric isotopic labeling proteomics.
Brunner A; Keidel EM; Dosch D; Kellermann J; Lottspeich F
Proteomics; 2010 Jan; 10(2):315-26. PubMed ID: 19953540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Absolute quantification of potential cancer markers in clinical tissue homogenates using multiple reaction monitoring on a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap tandem mass spectrometer.
DeSouza LV; Romaschin AD; Colgan TJ; Siu KW
Anal Chem; 2009 May; 81(9):3462-70. PubMed ID: 19323455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Combination of online enzyme digestion with stable isotope labeling for high-throughput quantitative proteome analysis.
Wang F; Wei X; Zhou H; Liu J; Figeys D; Zou H
Proteomics; 2012 Nov; 12(21):3129-37. PubMed ID: 22945397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multitagging proteomic strategy to estimate protein turnover rates in dynamic systems.
Jayapal KP; Sui S; Philp RJ; Kok YJ; Yap MG; Griffin TJ; Hu WS
J Proteome Res; 2010 May; 9(5):2087-97. PubMed ID: 20184388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Relative quantitation of proteins in expressed prostatic secretion with a stable isotope labeled secretome standard.
Zhao T; Zeng X; Bateman NW; Sun M; Teng PN; Bigbee WL; Dhir R; Nelson JB; Conrads TP; Hood BL
J Proteome Res; 2012 Feb; 11(2):1089-99. PubMed ID: 22077639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Metal-coded affinity tag labeling: a demonstration of analytical robustness and suitability for biological applications.
Ahrends R; Pieper S; Neumann B; Scheler C; Linscheid MW
Anal Chem; 2009 Mar; 81(6):2176-84. PubMed ID: 19228048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Inverse 15N-metabolic labeling/mass spectrometry for comparative proteomics and rapid identification of protein markers/targets.
Wang YK; Ma Z; Quinn DF; Fu EW
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2002; 16(14):1389-97. PubMed ID: 12112619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A new insight into the impact of different proteases on SILAC quantitative proteome of the mouse liver.
Ma J; Li W; Lv Y; Chang C; Wu S; Song L; Ding C; Wei H; He F; Jiang Y; Zhu Y
Proteomics; 2013 Aug; 13(15):2238-42. PubMed ID: 23703833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Proteomic analysis of opsins and thyroid hormone-induced retinal development using isotope-coded affinity tags (ICAT) and mass spectrometry.
Allison WT; Veldhoen KM; Hawryshyn CW
Mol Vis; 2006 Jun; 12():655-72. PubMed ID: 16785855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Time resolved protein-based stable isotope probing (Protein-SIP) analysis allows quantification of induced proteins in substrate shift experiments.
Taubert M; Jehmlich N; Vogt C; Richnow HH; Schmidt F; von Bergen M; Seifert J
Proteomics; 2011 Jun; 11(11):2265-74. PubMed ID: 21598395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. iTRAQ labeling is superior to mTRAQ for quantitative global proteomics and phosphoproteomics.
Mertins P; Udeshi ND; Clauser KR; Mani DR; Patel J; Ong SE; Jaffe JD; Carr SA
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2012 Jun; 11(6):M111.014423. PubMed ID: 22210691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
