These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20465551)

  • 1. Titanium hydride and hydrogen concentration in acid-etched commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy implants: a comparative analysis of five implant systems.
    Szmukler-Moncler S; Bischof M; Nedir R; Ermrich M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):944-50. PubMed ID: 20465551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants.
    Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
    Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation.
    Yang GL; He FM; Zhao SS; Wang XX; Zhao SF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Titanium dental implant surface micromorphology optimization.
    Juodzbalys G; Sapragoniene M; Wennerberg A; Baltrukonis T
    J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(4):177-85. PubMed ID: 17912958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cell response of titanium implant with a roughened surface containing titanium hydride: an in vitro study.
    Zhang F; Yang GL; He FM; Zhang LJ; Zhao SF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1131-9. PubMed ID: 20202734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface characterizations of variously treated titanium materials.
    Lim YJ; Oshida Y; Andres CJ; Barco MT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 11432653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of surface roughness on the displacement of osteogenic bone particles during placement of titanium screw-type implants.
    Tabassum A; Walboomers F; Wolke JG; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19673924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the bioactivity of titanium after varied surface treatments using human osteosarcoma osteoblast cells: an in vitro study.
    Singh RG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):998-1003. PubMed ID: 22010082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implant surface topographies analyzed using fractal dimension.
    Iezzi G; Aprile G; Tripodi D; Scarano A; Piattelli A; Perrotti V
    Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 21448022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of alterations on resorbable blasting media processed implant surfaces on early bone healing: a study in rabbits.
    Marin C; Bonfante EA; Granato R; Suzuki M; Granjeiro JM; Coelho PG
    Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 21448026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
    Fawzy AS; Amer MA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
    Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants.
    Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants: a study in dogs.
    Coelho PG; Cardaropoli G; Suzuki M; Lemons JE
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):292-302. PubMed ID: 18783412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
    He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1- and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium.
    Att W; Tsukimura N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 17974105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical and histomorphometric evaluations of rough titanium implants treated with hydrofluoric acid/nitric acid solution in rabbit tibia.
    He FM; Yang GL; Zhao SF; Cheng ZP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 21365046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Titanium nitride oxide coating on rough titanium stimulates the proliferation of human primary osteoblasts.
    Durual S; Pernet F; Rieder P; Mekki M; Cattani-Lorente M; Wiskott HW
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 21087318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
    Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.