These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2046597)

  • 1. Compensators for three-dimensional treatment planning.
    Mageras GS; Mohan R; Burman C; Barest GD; Kutcher GJ
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 2046597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inclusion of compensator-induced scatter and beam filtration in pencil beam dose calculations.
    du Plessis FC; Willemse CA
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2896-904. PubMed ID: 16964866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementation of a three-dimensional compensation system based on computed tomography generated surface contours and tissue inhomogeneities.
    Jursinic PA; Podgorsak MB; Paliwal BR
    Med Phys; 1994 Mar; 21(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 8208210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer aided design and verification of megavoltage tissue compensators for oblique beams.
    Faddegon BA; Pfalzner P
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(5):757-62. PubMed ID: 3141758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy.
    Jiang SB; Ayyangar KM
    Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):668-75. PubMed ID: 9608477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photon scatter in portal images: accuracy of a fluence based pencil beam superposition algorithm.
    McCurdy BM; Pistorius S
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):913-22. PubMed ID: 10841394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
    Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-specific compensation for Co-60 TBI treatments based on Monte Carlo design: A feasibility study.
    Serban M; Seuntjens J; Roussin E; Alexander A; Tremblay JR; Wierzbicki W
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26498377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A dual source photon beam model used in convolution/superposition dose calculations for clinical megavoltage x-ray beams.
    Liu HH; Mackie TR; McCullough EC
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1960-74. PubMed ID: 9434979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of fast Fourier transforms in calculating dose distributions for irregularly shaped fields for three-dimensional treatment planning.
    Mohan R; Chui CS
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 3104741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of the photon beam treatment planning data for a scanning beam machine.
    Lovelock DM; Chui CS; Kutcher GJ; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 1994 Dec; 21(12):1969-77. PubMed ID: 7700205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Build-up and surface dose measurements on phantoms using micro-MOSFET in 6 and 10 MV x-ray beams and comparisons with Monte Carlo calculations.
    Xiang HF; Song JS; Chin DW; Cormack RA; Tishler RB; Makrigiorgos GM; Court LE; Chin LM
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1266-73. PubMed ID: 17500458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pencil-beam redefinition algorithm for electron dose distributions.
    Shiu AS; Hogstrom KR
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 2008174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam.
    Magaddino V; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Schmidhalter D; Hirschi L; Fix MK
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21239148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms with Monte Carlo methods for photon arcs.
    Chow JC; Wong E; Chen JZ; Van Dyk J
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2686-94. PubMed ID: 14596305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A finite-size pencil beam model for photon dose calculations in three dimensions.
    Bourland JD; Chaney EL
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(6):1401-12. PubMed ID: 1461202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling dose distributions from portal dose images using the convolution/superposition method.
    McNutt TR; Mackie TR; Reckwerdt P; Paliwal BR
    Med Phys; 1996 Aug; 23(8):1381-92. PubMed ID: 8873035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design of a fast multileaf collimator for radiobiological optimized IMRT with scanned beams of photons, electrons, and light ions.
    Svensson R; Larsson S; Gudowska I; Holmberg R; Brahme A
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):877-88. PubMed ID: 17441233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Photon beam compensation design: dose optimization in 3D volume for parallel opposed beams.
    Li C
    Med Dosim; 1993; 18(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 8311916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.