BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20466388)

  • 1. When deriving the spatial QRS-T angle from the 12-lead electrocardiogram, which transform is more Frank: regression or inverse Dower?
    Cortez DL; Schlegel TT
    J Electrocardiol; 2010; 43(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 20466388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual transform applications for estimating the spatial QRS-T angle from the conventional 12-lead ECG: Kors is still most Frank.
    Cortez D; Sharma N; Devers C; Devers E; Schlegel TT
    J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 24099887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of the vectorcardiogram synthesis matrix on the power of the electrocardiogram-derived spatial QRS-T angle to predict arrhythmias in patients with ischemic heart disease and systolic left ventricular dysfunction.
    Man S; Algra AM; Schreurs CA; Borleffs CJ; Scherptong RW; van Erven L; van der Wall EE; Cannegieter SC; Schalij MJ; Swenne CA
    J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 21704219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The spatial QRS-T angle in the Frank vectorcardiogram: accuracy of estimates derived from the 12-lead electrocardiogram.
    Schreurs CA; Algra AM; Man SC; Cannegieter SC; van der Wall EE; Schalij MJ; Kors JA; Swenne CA
    J Electrocardiol; 2010; 43(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 20417936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normal limits of the spatial QRS-T angle and ventricular gradient in 12-lead electrocardiograms of young adults: dependence on sex and heart rate.
    Scherptong RW; Henkens IR; Man SC; Le Cessie S; Vliegen HW; Draisma HH; Maan AC; Schalij MJ; Swenne CA
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):648-55. PubMed ID: 18817923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determinants of the total cosine of the spatial angle between the QRS complex and the T wave (TCRT): implications for distinguishing primary from secondary T-wave abnormalities.
    Friedman HS
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jan; 40(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17067623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linear affine transformations between 3-lead (Frank XYZ leads) vectorcardiogram and 12-lead electrocardiogram signals.
    Dawson D; Yang H; Malshe M; Bukkapatnam ST; Benjamin B; Komanduri R
    J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 19608193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simple procedure for estimation of the spatial QRS/T angle from the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram.
    Rautaharju PM; Prineas RJ; Zhang ZM
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jul; 40(3):300-4. PubMed ID: 17292386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On designing and testing transformations for derivation of standard 12-lead/18-lead electrocardiograms and vectorcardiograms from reduced sets of predictor leads.
    Horácek BM; Warren JW; Wang JJ
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 18433613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The derivation of the spatial QRS-T angle and the spatial ventricular gradient using the Mason-Likar 12-lead electrocardiogram.
    Guldenring D; Finlay DD; Bond RR; Kennedy A; McLaughlin J; Galeotti L; Strauss DG
    J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(6):1045-52. PubMed ID: 26381798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Derivation of orthogonal leads from the 12-lead electrocardiogram. Performance of an atrial-based transform for the derivation of P loops.
    Guillem MS; Sahakian AV; Swiryn S
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 17888449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic utility of the spatial versus individual planar QRS-T angles in cardiac disease detection.
    Brown RA; Schlegel TT
    J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 21353236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Limitations of Dower's inverse transform for the study of atrial loops during atrial fibrillation.
    Guillem MS; Climent AM; Bollmann A; Husser D; Millet J; Castells F
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Aug; 32(8):972-80. PubMed ID: 19659614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of QRS complexes in electrocardiogram using support vector machine.
    Mehta SS; Lingayat NS
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(3):206-15. PubMed ID: 18432468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computing the spatial QRS-T angle using reduced electrocardiographic lead sets.
    Guldenring D; Finlay DD; Bond RR; Kennedy A; McLaughlin J; Galeotti L; Strauss DG
    J Electrocardiol; 2016; 49(6):794-799. PubMed ID: 27609012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ECG-derived spatial QRS-T angle is strongly associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
    Cortez D; Schlegel TT; Ackerman MJ; Bos JM
    J Electrocardiol; 2017; 50(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 27839835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The spatial QRS-T angle outperforms the Italian and Seattle ECG-based criteria for detection of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in pediatric patients.
    Cortez D; Sharma N; Cavanaugh J; Tuozo F; Derk G; Lundberg E; Schlegel TT; Weiner K; Kiciman N; Alejos J; Landeck B; Aboulhosn J; Miyamoto S; Batra A; McCanta AC
    J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(5):826-33. PubMed ID: 26275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A wavelet-based ECG delineator: evaluation on standard databases.
    Martínez JP; Almeida R; Olmos S; Rocha AP; Laguna P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Apr; 51(4):570-81. PubMed ID: 15072211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic significance of inverse spatial QRS-T angle circadian pattern in myocardial infarction survivors.
    Giannopoulos G; Dilaveris P; Batchvarov V; Synetos A; Hnatkova K; Gatzoulis K; Malik M; Stefanadis C
    J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 18723188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frank vectorcardiographic system from standard 12 lead ECG: An effort to enhance cardiovascular diagnosis.
    Maheshwari S; Acharyya A; Schiariti M; Puddu PE
    J Electrocardiol; 2016; 49(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 26806119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.