362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20466468)
1. Rigour and respect: aspects for consideration when undertaking and publishing research.
Marchant S
Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):264-7. PubMed ID: 20466468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Publishing and getting published.
Gardner G
Collegian; 2003 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 15534956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific letters.
Henly SJ
Nurs Res; 2008; 57(5):301. PubMed ID: 18794713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abandon propaganda! Embrace scholarship!
Dougherty MC
Nurs Res; 2010; 59(3):157. PubMed ID: 20445437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review.
Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):169-70. PubMed ID: 20637926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. How to get published in an international journal.
Fahy K
Women Birth; 2010 Jun; 23(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 20434718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Publishing in English-language journals.
Davis AJ; Tschudin V
Nurs Ethics; 2007 May; 14(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 17459824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review.
Scarfe WC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
Clarke SP
Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Thoughts on the end of the article: the implications for nursing practice.
Becker PT
Res Nurs Health; 2009 Jun; 32(3):241-2. PubMed ID: 19280621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Focus on peer review.
Dougherty MC
Nurs Res; 2010; 59(6):371. PubMed ID: 21048481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Publishing your findings.
King KM; Price PM
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2003; 13(2):46-8. PubMed ID: 12802838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bad papers by Caveman.
J Cell Sci; 2005 Mar; 118(Pt 6):1103-4. PubMed ID: 15764593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
Clarke SP
Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process.
Peternelj-Taylor C
J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 21114756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Writing for publication: the basics.
Fahy K
Women Birth; 2008 Jun; 21(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 18282754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hitting the bull's eye rather than shooting yourself between the eyes.
Froman RD
Res Nurs Health; 2008 Oct; 31(5):399-401. PubMed ID: 18613067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Keeping up journal integrity: the peer-review process.
Moore KN
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2005; 32(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 15718949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
