These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20466473)
1. Comparison between interpositional bone grafting and osteogenic alveolar distraction in alveolar bone reconstruction. Hashemi HM; Javidi B J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1853-8. PubMed ID: 20466473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in the volume and density of calvarial split bone grafts after alveolar ridge augmentation. Smolka W; Eggensperger N; Carollo V; Ozdoba C; Iizuka T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 16584410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Augmentation in two stages of atrophic alveolar bone prior to dental rehabilitation: a case report. Zahrani AA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Sep; 8(6):57-63. PubMed ID: 17846672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone quality at the implant site after reconstruction of a local defect of the maxillary anterior ridge with chin bone or deproteinised cancellous bovine bone. Meijndert L; Raghoebar GM; Schüpbach P; Meijer HJ; Vissink A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 34(8):877-84. PubMed ID: 15978776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stereologic analysis of bone produced by distraction osteogenesis or autogenous bone grafting in mandible. Cakir-Ozkan N; Eyibilen A; Ozkan F; Ozyurt B; Aslan H J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):735-40. PubMed ID: 20485038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay bone grafting for alveolar ridge augmentation: Technique, complications, and implant survival rates. Uckan S; Veziroglu F; Dayangac E Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 18928897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Alveolar width distraction osteogenesis for early implant placement. Laster Z; Rachmiel A; Jensen OT J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1724-30. PubMed ID: 16297692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay grafting. Part I: outcome of implant integration. Perry M; Hodges N; Hallmon DW; Rees T; Opperman LA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 16274142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Formation of new bone during vertical distraction osteogenesis of the human mandible is related to the presence of blood vessels. Amir LR; Becking AG; Jovanovic A; Perdijk FB; Everts V; Bronckers AL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 16907772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Autogenous onlay bone grafts vs. alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 2-4-year prospective study on humans. Chiapasco M; Zaniboni M; Rimondini L Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 17501979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis. Rachmiel A; Srouji S; Peled M Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Dec; 30(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 11829233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis versus inlay bone grafting in posterior mandibular atrophy: a prospective study. Bianchi A; Felice P; Lizio G; Marchetti C Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Mar; 105(3):282-92. PubMed ID: 18280960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Osteogenesis distraction and platelet-rich plasma: combined use in restoration of severe atrophic mandible. Long-term results. Robiony M; Zorzan E; Polini F; Sembronio S; Toro C; Politi M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1202-10. PubMed ID: 18983325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screw "tent-pole" grafting technique for reconstruction of large vertical alveolar ridge defects using human mineralized allograft for implant site preparation. Le B; Rohrer MD; Prasad HS J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):428-35. PubMed ID: 20116718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Bone mineral density and biomechanical characters of the augmented alveolar ridge by distraction osteogenesis using Ti-Ni shape memory alloy distractor]. Xie M; Hu M; Liu HC; Yao J; Zhou HZ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 41(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 16620629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in alveolar distraction osteogenesis in a series of 17 patients. González-García A; Diniz-Freitas M; Somoza-Martín M; García-García A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):891-6. PubMed ID: 19014159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpositional bone grafts in the posterior mandibular region: a report on six patients. Marchetti C; Trasarti S; Corinaldesi G; Felice P Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Dec; 27(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 18092449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial. Cordaro L; Bosshardt DD; Palattella P; Rao W; Serino G; Chiapasco M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 18705811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vertical alveolar ridge distraction with prosthetic treatable distractors: a clinical investigation. Gaggl A; Schultes G; Kärcher H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):701-10. PubMed ID: 11055137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]