These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20466537)

  • 1. Impact of information about risks and benefits of cancer screening on intended participation.
    Perneger TV; Cullati S; Schiesari L; Charvet-Bérard A
    Eur J Cancer; 2010 Aug; 46(12):2267-74. PubMed ID: 20466537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does information about risks and benefits improve the decision-making process in cancer screening - randomized study.
    Perneger TV; Schiesari L; Cullati S; Charvet-Bérard A
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(6):574-9. PubMed ID: 21622043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploratory study examining barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening.
    Paddison JS; Yip MJ
    Aust J Rural Health; 2010 Feb; 18(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 20136809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patients' interest in discussing cancer risk and risk management with primary care physicians.
    Buchanan AH; Skinner CS; Rawl SM; Moser BK; Champion VL; Scott LL; Strigo TS; Bastian L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2005 Apr; 57(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 15797155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programs.
    Zapka JG; Geller BM; Bulliard JL; Fracheboud J; Sancho-Garnier H; Ballard-Barbash R;
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):126-37. PubMed ID: 16962910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cancer patients seeking information from sources outside the health care system: change over a decade.
    Carlsson ME
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2009 Sep; 13(4):304-5. PubMed ID: 19362053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivation, illness representations and short-term psychological impact.
    Claes E; Denayer L; Evers-Kiebooms G; Boogaerts A; Legius E
    Patient Educ Couns; 2004 Nov; 55(2):265-74. PubMed ID: 15530764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Acceptance of and satisfaction with medical information provided to cancer patients].
    Hejna M; Köstler WJ; Tomek S; Fiebiger WC; Raderer M; Wiltschke C; Zielinski CC
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2001 Apr; 113(9):342-7. PubMed ID: 11388081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Knowledge of risk management strategies, and information and risk management preferences of women at increased risk for ovarian cancer.
    Tiller K; Meiser B; Gould L; Tucker K; Dudding T; Franklin J; Friedlander M; Andrews L
    Psychooncology; 2005 Apr; 14(4):249-61. PubMed ID: 15386771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to enhance physician and public acceptance and utilisation of colon cancer screening recommendations.
    Senore C; Malila N; Minozzi S; Armaroli P
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):509-20. PubMed ID: 20833353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complementary therapies for cancer patients: assessing information use and needs.
    Verhoef MJ; Trojan L; Armitage GD; Carlson L; Hilsden RJ
    Chronic Dis Can; 2009; 29(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 19281693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short report: what do men with prostate cancer want to know?
    Gulavita S; Sinnott C; Setliff AE; Sellick SM
    Can Fam Physician; 2000 Sep; 46():1769-71. PubMed ID: 11013795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incidental health information use and media complementarity: a comparison of senior and non-senior cancer patients.
    Tian Y; Robinson JD
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jun; 71(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 18372141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical cancer screening in Malaysia: Are targeted interventions necessary?
    Dunn RA; Tan AK
    Soc Sci Med; 2010 Sep; 71(6):1089-93. PubMed ID: 20685019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of knowledge, education, and experience on acceptance of first trimester screening for chromosomal anomalies.
    Stefansdottir V; Skirton H; Jonasson K; Hardardottir H; Jonsson JJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Jul; 89(7):931-8. PubMed ID: 20235896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Common psychosocial factors underlying breast cancer screening and breast cancer treatment adherence: a conceptual review and synthesis.
    Magai C; Consedine N; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007; 16(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 17324093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of an oral care diary by patients during chemotherapy.
    Miller M; Taylor A; Kearney N; Paterson G; Wells M; Roe L; Hagen S; Maguire R
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Jul; 44(5):693-701. PubMed ID: 16545385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Information on early cancer diagnosis: what do the patients want?].
    Koch K
    Med Klin (Munich); 2003 Jul; 98(7):400-3. PubMed ID: 12937906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Colorectal cancer screening: how to help patients comply.
    Goldsmith G; Chiaro C
    J Fam Pract; 2008 Jul; 57(7):E2-7. PubMed ID: 18625166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.