202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20466618)
1. The role of the pathologist in rectal cancer diagnosis and staging and surgical quality assessment.
Faus C; Roda D; Frasson M; Roselló S; García-Granero E; Flor-Lorente B; Navarro S
Clin Transl Oncol; 2010 May; 12(5):339-45. PubMed ID: 20466618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Update on the surgical pathology standards on rectal cancer diagnosis, staging and quality assessment of surgery.
Rojo A; Sancho P; Alonso O; Encinas S; Toledo G; García JF
Clin Transl Oncol; 2010 Jun; 12(6):431-6. PubMed ID: 20534398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Circumferential resection margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer].
Ihnát P; Martínek L; Ihnát Rudinská L; Mitták M; Vávra P; Zonča P
Rozhl Chir; 2013 Jun; 92(6):297-303. PubMed ID: 23965313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cancer of the upper rectum.
Bondeven P
Dan Med J; 2016 Oct; 63(10):. PubMed ID: 27697137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of total mesorectal excision and of circumferential resection margin in local recurrence and survival of patients with rectal carcinoma.
Tzardi M
Dig Dis; 2007; 25(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 17384508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control.
Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ; van der Worp E; Kapiteijn E; Quirke P; van Krieken JH;
J Clin Oncol; 2002 Apr; 20(7):1729-34. PubMed ID: 11919228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Preoperative staging of rectal cancer].
Schäfer AO; Baumann T; Pache G; Wiech T; Langer M
Radiologe; 2007 Jul; 47(7):635-51; quiz 652. PubMed ID: 17581734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The circumferential margin in rectal cancer. Recommendations based on the Dutch Total Mesorectal Excision Study.
Wiggers T; van de Velde CJ
Eur J Cancer; 2002 May; 38(7):973-6. PubMed ID: 11978522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The pathological assessment of mesorectal excision: implications for further treatment and quality management.
Hermanek P; Hermanek P; Hohenberger W; Klimpfinger M; Köckerling F; Papadopoulos T
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2003 Jul; 18(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 12774249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Importance of surgical margins in rectal cancer.
Mukkai Krishnamurty D; Wise PE
J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 113(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 27094456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Parametric monitoring of the quality of total mesorectal excision and surgical treatment of rectal carcinoma results of a multicenter study].
Hoch J; Ferko A; Bláha M; Ryška A; Čapov I; Dušek L; Feit J; Grega M; Hermanová M; Hovorková E; Chmelová R; Kala Z; Klos D; Kodet R; Langer D; Hadži-Nikolov D; Örhalmi J; Páral J; Tichý M; Tučková I; Vjaclovský M; Vlček P
Rozhl Chir; 2016; 95(7):262-71. PubMed ID: 27523174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The pathological assessment of total mesorectal excision: what are the relevant resection margins?
Autschbach F
Recent Results Cancer Res; 2005; 165():30-9. PubMed ID: 15865018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal surgical treatment of locally advanced low rectal cancer.
Liska D; Weiser MR
Minerva Chir; 2010 Apr; 65(2):181-96. PubMed ID: 20548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Macroscopic assessment of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a useful tool for improving quality control in a multidisciplinary team.
García-Granero E; Faiz O; Muñoz E; Flor B; Navarro S; Faus C; García-Botello SA; Lledó S; Cervantes A
Cancer; 2009 Aug; 115(15):3400-11. PubMed ID: 19479978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymph node ratio and surgical quality are strong prognostic factors of rectal cancer: results from a single referral centre.
Leonard D; Remue C; Abbes Orabi N; van Maanen A; Danse E; Dragean A; Debetancourt D; Humblet Y; Jouret-Mourin A; Maddalena F; Medina Benites A; Scalliet P; Sempoux C; Van den Eynde M; De Schoutheete JC; Kartheuser A
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Jun; 18(6):O175-84. PubMed ID: 27128602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of pathologists in the quality control of diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer-an overview.
Nagtegaal ID; van Krieken JH
Eur J Cancer; 2002 May; 38(7):964-72. PubMed ID: 11978521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accurate staging, selective preoperative therapy and optimal surgery improves outcome in rectal cancer: a review of the recent evidence.
Daniels IR; Fisher SE; Heald RJ; Moran BJ
Colorectal Dis; 2007 May; 9(4):290-301. PubMed ID: 17432979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based indication for neoadjuvant treatment of rectal carcinoma and the surrogate endpoint CRM status.
Strassburg J; Junginger T; Trinh T; Püttcher O; Oberholzer K; Heald RJ; Hermanek P
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2008 Nov; 23(11):1099-107. PubMed ID: 18633624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery.
Beets-Tan RG; Beets GL; Vliegen RF; Kessels AG; Van Boven H; De Bruine A; von Meyenfeldt MF; Baeten CG; van Engelshoven JM
Lancet; 2001 Feb; 357(9255):497-504. PubMed ID: 11229667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of MRI for staging of rectal cancer.
Jhaveri KS; Sadaf A
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2009 Apr; 9(4):469-81. PubMed ID: 19374600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]