200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20466791)
1. Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trial.
Marteau TM; Mann E; Prevost AT; Vasconcelos JC; Kellar I; Sanderson S; Parker M; Griffin S; Sutton S; Kinmonth AL
BMJ; 2010 May; 340():c2138. PubMed ID: 20466791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): trial protocol.
Mann E; Prevost AT; Griffin S; Kellar I; Sutton S; Parker M; Sanderson S; Kinmonth AL; Marteau TM
BMC Public Health; 2009 Feb; 9():63. PubMed ID: 19232112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can informed choice invitations lead to inequities in intentions to make lifestyle changes among participants in a primary care diabetes screening programme? Evidence from a randomized trial.
Kellar I; Mann E; Kinmonth AL; Prevost AT; Sutton S; Marteau TM
Public Health; 2011 Sep; 125(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 21764087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of an informed choice invitation for type 2 diabetes screening.
Kellar I; Sutton S; Griffin S; Prevost AT; Kinmonth AL; Marteau TM
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Aug; 72(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 18513916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cluster randomised trial of strategies to increase cervical screening uptake at first invitation (STRATEGIC).
Kitchener HC; Gittins M; Rivero-Arias O; Tsiachristas A; Cruickshank M; Gray A; Brabin L; Torgerson D; Crosbie EJ; Sargent A; Roberts C
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Sep; 20(68):1-138. PubMed ID: 27632816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of informed-choice invitations on diabetes screening knowledge, attitude and intentions: an analogue study.
Mann E; Kellar I; Sutton S; Kinmonth AL; Hankins M; Griffin S; Marteau TM
BMC Public Health; 2010 Dec; 10():768. PubMed ID: 21167033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Start2quit: a randomised clinical controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using personal tailored risk information and taster sessions to increase the uptake of the NHS Stop Smoking Services.
Gilbert H; Sutton S; Morris R; Petersen I; Wu Q; Parrott S; Galton S; Kale D; Magee MS; Gardner L; Nazareth I
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jan; 21(3):1-206. PubMed ID: 28121288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT): protocol for a randomised controlled demonstration lung cancer screening pilot testing a targeted invitation strategy for high risk and 'hard-to-reach' patients.
Quaife SL; Ruparel M; Beeken RJ; McEwen A; Isitt J; Nolan G; Sennett K; Baldwin DR; Duffy SW; Janes SM; Wardle J
BMC Cancer; 2016 Apr; 16():281. PubMed ID: 27098676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening for type 2 diabetes is feasible, acceptable, but associated with increased short-term anxiety: a randomised controlled trial in British general practice.
Park P; Simmons RK; Prevost AT; Griffin SJ
BMC Public Health; 2008 Oct; 8():350. PubMed ID: 18840266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized evaluation of loss and gain frames in an invitation to screening for type 2 diabetes: effects on attendance, anxiety and self-rated health.
Park P; Simmons RK; Prevost AT; Griffin SJ;
J Health Psychol; 2010 Mar; 15(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 20207663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.
Christie D; Thompson R; Sawtell M; Allen E; Cairns J; Smith F; Jamieson E; Hargreaves K; Ingold A; Brooks L; Wiggins M; Oliver S; Jones R; Elbourne D; Santos A; Wong IC; O'Neill S; Strange V; Hindmarsh P; Annan F; Viner R
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Mar; 18(20):1-202. PubMed ID: 24690402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effectiveness of an enhanced invitation letter on uptake of National Health Service Health Checks in primary care: a pragmatic quasi-randomised controlled trial.
Sallis A; Bunten A; Bonus A; James A; Chadborn T; Berry D
BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Mar; 17():35. PubMed ID: 27009045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial.
Smith SK; Trevena L; Simpson JM; Barratt A; Nutbeam D; McCaffery KJ
BMJ; 2010 Oct; 341():c5370. PubMed ID: 20978060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced invitation methods and uptake of health checks in primary care: randomised controlled trial and cohort study using electronic health records.
McDermott L; Wright AJ; Cornelius V; Burgess C; Forster AS; Ashworth M; Khoshaba B; Clery P; Fuller F; Miller J; Dodhia H; Rudisill C; Conner MT; Gulliford MC
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Nov; 20(84):1-92. PubMed ID: 27846927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low attendance at structured education for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: General practice characteristics and individual patient factors predict uptake.
Winkley K; Stahl D; Chamley M; Stopford R; Boughdady M; Thomas S; Amiel SA; Forbes A; Ismail K
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jan; 99(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 26319362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Socioeconomic factors related to attendance at a Type 2 diabetes screening programme.
Dalsgaard EM; Lauritzen T; Christiansen T; Mai KS; Borch-Johnsen K; Sandbaek A
Diabet Med; 2009 May; 26(5):518-25. PubMed ID: 19646192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies in primary care: a cohort study and cluster randomised trial to inform a simulation model. The Screening for Haemoglobinopathies in First Trimester (SHIFT) trial.
Dormandy E; Bryan S; Gulliford MC; Roberts TE; Ades AE; Calnan M; Atkin K; Karnon J; Barton PM; Logan J; Kavalier F; Harris HJ; Johnston TA; Anionwu EN; Davis V; Brown K; Juarez-Garcia A; Tsianakas V; Marteau TM
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Apr; 14(20):1-160. PubMed ID: 20416236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Reder M; Kolip P
BMC Womens Health; 2015 Jul; 15():53. PubMed ID: 26198675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial.
Pérez-Lacasta MJ; Martínez-Alonso M; Garcia M; Sala M; Perestelo-Pérez L; Vidal C; Codern-Bové N; Feijoo-Cid M; Toledo-Chávarri A; Cardona À; Pons A; Carles-Lavila M; Rue M;
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214057. PubMed ID: 30913217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
