These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20467075)

  • 1. Terminal digit bias is not an issue for properly trained healthcare personnel using manual or semi-automated devices - biomed 2010.
    Butler KR; Minor DS; Benghuzzi HA; Tucci M
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2010; 46():75-80. PubMed ID: 20467075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice.
    Thavarajah S; White WB; Mansoor GA
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec; 17(12):819-22. PubMed ID: 14704725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
    Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association of an Automated Blood Pressure Measurement Quality Improvement Program With Terminal Digit Preference and Recorded Mean Blood Pressure in 11 Clinics.
    Kottke TE; Anderson JP; Zillhardt JD; Sperl-Hillen JM; O'Connor PJ; Green BB; Williams RA; Averbeck BM; Stiffman MN; Beran M; Rakotz M; Margolis KL
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Aug; 5(8):e2229098. PubMed ID: 36044216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. End-digit preference in blood pressure recordings of patients with ischaemic heart disease in primary care.
    de Lusignan S; Belsey J; Hague N; Dzregah B
    J Hum Hypertens; 2004 Apr; 18(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 15037875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
    Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. End digit preference in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic in southwest Nigeria.
    Ayodele OE; Sanya EO; Okunola OO; Akintunde AA
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2012 Mar; 23(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 22447477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
    Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of automated blood pressure measurements in clinical trials and registration studies: data from the VALTOP Study.
    Mengden T; Asmar R; Kandra A; Di Giovanni R; Brudi P; Parati G
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Aug; 15(4):188-94. PubMed ID: 20543666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders?
    Hla KM; Vokaty KA; Feussner JR
    Arch Intern Med; 1986 Dec; 146(12):2373-6. PubMed ID: 2877645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of observer and patient factors on the occurrence of digit preference for zero in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic: evidence for the need of continued observation.
    Graves JW; Bailey KR; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Meverden RA; Grill DE; Sheps SG
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Jun; 19(6):567-72. PubMed ID: 16733227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are self-reported telemonitored blood pressure readings affected by end-digit preference: a prospective cohort study in Scotland.
    Parker RA; Paterson M; Padfield P; Pinnock H; Hanley J; Hammersley VS; Steventon A; McKinstry B
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e019431. PubMed ID: 29391369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. End-digit preference in general practice: a comparison of the conventional auscultatory and electronic oscillometric methods.
    Burnier M; Gasser UE
    Blood Press; 2008; 17(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 18568699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of blood pressure phenotype in the Nigerian Population Research on Environment Gene and Health.
    Odili AN; Ameh VO; Ogedengbe JO; Staessen JA
    Blood Press Monit; 2014 Aug; 19(4):220-5. PubMed ID: 24892880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of end-digit preference in blood pressure records of hospitalized chinese patients and analysis of risk factors.
    Jie G; Jian W; Qiaowen H; Shanzhu Z
    Postgrad Med; 2012 Mar; 124(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 22437215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variation in recorded blood pressure terminal digit bias in general practice.
    Harrison WN; Lancashire RJ; Marshall TP
    J Hum Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 22(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 18046433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A meta-analytical approach to the pooling of blood pressure values in children.
    Nuutinen M; Turtinen J; Uhari M
    Arctic Med Res; 1996 Jul; 55(3):107-17. PubMed ID: 8885432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agreement between emergency medical services and expert blood pressure measurements.
    Cienki JJ; DeLuca LA
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Jul; 43(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 21982624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of the Dinamap 1846 XT automated blood pressure monitor.
    Beaubien ER; Card CM; Card SE; Biem HJ; Wilson TW
    J Hum Hypertens; 2002 Sep; 16(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 12214262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.