These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20467145)
1. Current state of surgical myocardial revascularization. Sellke FW; Chu LM; Cohn WE Circ J; 2010 Jun; 74(6):1031-7. PubMed ID: 20467145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved long-term survival for diabetic patients with surgical versus interventional revascularization. Kurlansky P; Herbert M; Prince S; Mack MJ Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Apr; 99(4):1298-305. PubMed ID: 25686668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Myocardial revascularization for the elderly: current options, role of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and outcomes. Raja SG Curr Cardiol Rev; 2012 Feb; 8(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 22845813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hybrid coronary revascularization by endoscopic robotic coronary artery bypass grafting on beating heart and stent placement. Gao C; Yang M; Wu Y; Wang G; Xiao C; Liu H; Lu C Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Mar; 87(3):737-41. PubMed ID: 19231382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What will surgical coronary revascularization look like in 25 years? Caliskan E; Emmert MY; Falk V Curr Opin Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 34(6):637-644. PubMed ID: 31464771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between off- and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: long-term results of a real-world registry. Nicolini F; Fortuna D; Contini GA; Pacini D; Gabbieri D; Zussa C; De Palma R; Vezzani A; Gherli T; Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Sep; 50(3):528-35. PubMed ID: 27118313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Comparative Effectiveness Analysis With Long-Term Follow-up. Hage A; Giambruno V; Jones P; Chu MW; Fox S; Teefy P; Lavi S; Bainbridge D; Harle C; Iglesias I; Dobkowski W; Kiaii B J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Dec; 8(24):e014204. PubMed ID: 31826727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting-A Systematic Review and Analysis of Clinical Outcomes. Shaefi S; Mittel A; Loberman D; Ramakrishna H J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2019 Jan; 33(1):232-244. PubMed ID: 29753665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Developments in surgical revascularization to achieve improved morbidity and mortality. Sepehripour AH; Athanasiou T Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2016; 14(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 26589373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The ideal conduit for surgical revascularization: the quest for the holy grail continues. Slaughter MS Circulation; 2010 Aug; 122(9):857-8. PubMed ID: 20713895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Is it time to change how we think about incomplete coronary revascularization? Spadaccio C; Nappi F; Nenna A; Beattie G; Chello M; Sutherland FW Int J Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 224():295-298. PubMed ID: 27665400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does body mass index impact the early outcome of surgical revascularization? A comparison between off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Caliskan E; Güsewell S; Seifert B; Theusinger OM; Starck CT; Pavicevic J; Reser D; Holubec T; Plass A; Falk V; Emmert MY Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Nov; 19(5):749-55. PubMed ID: 25063770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One-stop hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease: 3-year follow-up results from a single institution. Shen L; Hu S; Wang H; Xiong H; Zheng Z; Li L; Xu B; Yan H; Gao R J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 61(25):2525-33. PubMed ID: 23623906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]