774 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20467288)
21. Indinavir/ritonavir-based therapy in HIV-1-infected antiretroviral therapy-naive patients: comparison of 800/100 mg and 400/100 mg twice daily.
Konopnicki D; De Wit S; Poll B; Crommentuyn K; Huitema A; Clumeck N
HIV Med; 2005 Jan; 6(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15670245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The SWITCHMRK studies: substitution of lopinavir/ritonavir with raltegravir in HIV-positive individuals.
Cocohoba J
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther; 2009 Dec; 7(10):1159-63. PubMed ID: 19968507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Antiretroviral treatment. HIV infection in adults: better-defined first-line treatment.
Prescrire Int; 2004 Aug; 13(72):144-50. PubMed ID: 15532140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Superior virological response to boosted protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in an observational treatment programme.
Wood E; Hogg RS; Yip B; Moore D; Harrigan PR; Montaner JS
HIV Med; 2007 Mar; 8(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 17352763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Efficacy and tolerability of a double boosted protease inhibitor (lopinavir + saquinavir/ritonavir) regimen in HIV-infected patients who failed treatment with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
Chetchotisakd P; Anunnatsiri S; Mootsikapun P; Kiertiburanakul S; Anekthananon T; Bowonwatanuwong C; Kowadisaiburana B; Supparatpinyo K; Ruxrungtham K;
HIV Med; 2007 Nov; 8(8):529-35. PubMed ID: 17944686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Long-term (96-week) follow-up of antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients treated with first-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy in the MONARK trial.
Ghosn J; Flandre P; Cohen-Codar I; Girard PM; Chaix ML; Raffi F; Dellamonica P; Ngovan P; Norton M; Delfraissy JF;
HIV Med; 2010 Feb; 11(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 19682100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Twice-daily amprenavir 1200 mg versus amprenavir 600 mg/ritonavir 100 mg, in combination with at least 2 other antiretroviral drugs, in HIV-1-infected patients.
Nadler JP; Gathe JC; Pollard RB; Richmond GJ; Liao Q; Griffith S; Lancaster CT; Hernandez JE; Pappa KA;
BMC Infect Dis; 2003 Jun; 3():10. PubMed ID: 12795812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Lopinavir-ritonavir versus nelfinavir for the initial treatment of HIV infection.
Walmsley S; Bernstein B; King M; Arribas J; Beall G; Ruane P; Johnson M; Johnson D; Lalonde R; Japour A; Brun S; Sun E;
N Engl J Med; 2002 Jun; 346(26):2039-46. PubMed ID: 12087139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of switching from a protease inhibitor to nevirapine in patients with undetectable viral load.
Arranz Caso JA; López JC; Santos I; Estrada V; Castilla V; Sanz J; Sanz J; Molina JP; Fernández Guerrero M; Górgolas M
HIV Med; 2005 Sep; 6(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 16156884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The 48-week efficacy of once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir in patients with undetectable viral load after 3 years of antiretroviral therapy.
Cardiello P; Srasuebkul P; Hassink E; Mahanontharit A; Samor T; Ruxrungtham K; Lange J; Cooper D; Phanuphak P
HIV Med; 2005 Mar; 6(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15807718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Safety and efficacy of treatment switch to raltegravir plus tenofovir/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine in patients with optimal virological control: 48-week results from a randomized pilot study (Raltegravir Switch for Toxicity or Adverse Events, RASTA Study).
Fabbiani M; Mondi A; Colafigli M; D'Ettorre G; Paoletti F; D'Avino A; Ciccarelli N; Sidella L; Murri R; Fortuna S; Vullo V; Cauda R; De Luca A; Di Giambenedetto S
Scand J Infect Dis; 2014 Jan; 46(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 24161018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Postprandial lipid effects of low-dose ritonavir vs. raltegravir in HIV-uninfected adults.
Samaras K; Richardson R; Carr A
AIDS; 2010 Jul; 24(11):1727-31. PubMed ID: 20588105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy versus lopinavir-ritonavir and two nucleosides for maintenance therapy of HIV.
Pulido F; Arribas JR; Delgado R; Cabrero E; González-García J; Pérez-Elias MJ; Arranz A; Portilla J; Pasquau J; Iribarren JA; Rubio R; Norton M;
AIDS; 2008 Jan; 22(2):F1-9. PubMed ID: 18097218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Inhibitory quotient as a prognostic factor of response to a salvage antiretroviral therapy containing ritonavir-boosted saquinavir. The CIVSA Study.
Mallolas J; Blanco J; Labarga P; Vergara A; Ocampo A; Sarasa M; Arnedo M; López-Púa Y; García J; Juega J; Guelar A; Terrón A; Dalmau D; García I; Zárraga M; Martínez E; Carné X; Pumarola T; Escayola R; Gatell J
HIV Med; 2007 May; 8(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 17461850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The LOPSAQ study: 48 week analysis of a boosted double protease inhibitor regimen containing lopinavir/ritonavir plus saquinavir without additional antiretroviral therapy.
Staszewski S; Babacan E; Stephan C; Haberl A; Carlebach A; Gute P; Klauke S; Hermschulte Y; Stuermer M; Dauer B;
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2006 Nov; 58(5):1024-30. PubMed ID: 16956902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus raltegravir for treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults with virological failure of a standard first-line ART regimen (SECOND-LINE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority study.
; Boyd MA; Kumarasamy N; Moore CL; Nwizu C; Losso MH; Mohapi L; Martin A; Kerr S; Sohn AH; Teppler H; Van de Steen O; Molina JM; Emery S; Cooper DA
Lancet; 2013 Jun; 381(9883):2091-9. PubMed ID: 23769235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. First-line raltegravir. No evidence of comparative effectiveness.
Prescrire Int; 2010 Nov; 19(110):248-50. PubMed ID: 21284354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Boosted versus unboosted indinavir with zidovudine and lamivudine in nucleoside pre-treated patients: a randomized, open-label trial with 112 weeks of follow-up (HIV-NAT 005).
Boyd MA; Srasuebkul P; Khongphattanayothin M; Ruxrungtham K; Hassink EA; Duncombe CJ; Ubolyam S; Burger DM; Reiss P; Stek M; Lange J; Cooper DA; Phanuphak P
Antivir Ther; 2006; 11(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 16640103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Simplification to rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate from ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor antiretroviral therapy in a randomized trial of HIV-1 RNA-suppressed participants.
Palella FJ; Fisher M; Tebas P; Gazzard B; Ruane P; Van Lunzen J; Shamblaw D; Flamm J; Ebrahimi R; Porter D; White K; Hindman J; Elbert E; De-Oertel S; Fralich T
AIDS; 2014 Jan; 28(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 24670520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy versus boosted protease inhibitor plus lamivudine dual therapy as second-line maintenance treatment for HIV-1-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa (ANRS12 286/MOBIDIP): a multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label, superiority trial.
Ciaffi L; Koulla-Shiro S; Sawadogo AB; Ndour CT; Eymard-Duvernay S; Mbouyap PR; Ayangma L; Zoungrana J; Gueye NFN; Diallo M; Izard S; Bado G; Kane CT; Aghokeng AF; Peeters M; Girard PM; Le Moing V; Reynes J; Delaporte E;
Lancet HIV; 2017 Sep; 4(9):e384-e392. PubMed ID: 28566227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
