BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20470861)

  • 1. Attempting to hide our real thoughts: electrophysiological evidence from truthful and deceptive responses during evaluation.
    Dong G; Wu H
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 20470861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):386-404. PubMed ID: 16099352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An event-related potential study of deception to self preferences.
    Tu S; Li H; Jou J; Zhang Q; Wang T; Yu C; Qiu J
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1247():142-8. PubMed ID: 18952072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(7):878-901. PubMed ID: 14998703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.
    CarriĆ³n RE; Keenan JP; Sebanz N
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19836013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
    Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The processes leading to deception: ERP spatiotemporal principal component analysis and source analysis.
    Sun SY; Mai X; Liu C; Liu JY; Luo YJ
    Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(4):348-59. PubMed ID: 21225491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neurophysiological signature of effective anticipatory task-set control: a task-switching investigation.
    Lavric A; Mizon GA; Monsell S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 28(5):1016-29. PubMed ID: 18717737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extracting the internal representation of faces from human brain activity: an analogue to reverse correlation.
    Hansen BC; Thompson B; Hess RF; Ellemberg D
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):373-90. PubMed ID: 20156567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():181-90. PubMed ID: 18793621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive load reduces visual identity negative priming by disabling the retrieval of task-inappropriate prime information: an ERP study.
    Gibbons H; Stahl J
    Brain Res; 2010 May; 1330():101-13. PubMed ID: 20233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics of alpha power event-related desynchronization in the discrimination of spontaneous deceptive responses.
    Kim S; Jung KH; Lee JH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Aug; 85(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 22554580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual object cognition precedes but also temporally overlaps mental rotation.
    Schendan HE; Lucia LC
    Brain Res; 2009 Oct; 1294():91-105. PubMed ID: 19631629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-related potential correlates of the extraverts' sensitivity to valence changes in positive stimuli.
    Yuan J; He Y; Lei Y; Yang J; Li H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Aug; 20(12):1071-6. PubMed ID: 19543131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial expression decoding as a function of emotional meaning status: ERP evidence.
    Paulmann S; Pell MD
    Neuroreport; 2009 Dec; 20(18):1603-8. PubMed ID: 19901857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The late positive potential and explicit versus implicit processing of facial valence.
    Van Strien JW; De Sonneville LM; Franken IH
    Neuroreport; 2010 Jun; 21(9):656-61. PubMed ID: 20453693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does willingness affect the N2-P3 effect of deceptive and honest responses?
    Wu H; Hu X; Fu G
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Dec; 467(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 19818837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying cognitive preferences for attractive female faces: an event-related potential experiment using a study-test paradigm.
    Zhang Y; Kong F; Chen H; Jackson T; Han L; Meng J; Yang Z; Gao J; Najam ul Hasan A
    J Neurosci Res; 2011 Nov; 89(11):1887-93. PubMed ID: 21805493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thirty-site P300 scalp distribution, amplitude variance across sites, and amplitude in detection of deceptive concealment of multiple guilty items.
    Lui MA; Rosenfeld JP; Ryan AH
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):491-509. PubMed ID: 18633836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.