These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2047107)

  • 1. Initial development and in vitro evaluation of the HPL device for obtaining reproducible bitewing radiographs of children.
    Pitts NB; Hamood SS; Longbottom C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 May; 71(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 2047107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vivo evaluation in children of the HPL bitewing device.
    Pitts NB; Hamood SS; Longbottom C
    J Dent; 1989 Dec; 17(6):272-8. PubMed ID: 2691539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of bitewing positioning devices in children's dentistry.
    Pitts NB; Hamood SS; Longbottom C; Rimmer PA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 1807994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of bitewing radiographs in children in relation to the type of film holder used.
    Herman HD; Ashkenazi M
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 23595621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assembly and clinical use of the XCP-ORA: a three-function dental X-ray film positioning device for taking anterior and posterior periapical and bitewing intraoral radiographs.
    Mamoun JS
    Dent Assist; 2011; 80(3):38-40, 42-3. PubMed ID: 21739876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bitewing radiographs of children taken with and without a film-holding device.
    Harrison R; Richardson D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Aug; 18(3):97-9. PubMed ID: 2637884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bitewing film quality: a clinical comparison of the loop vs. holder techniques.
    Kositbowornchai S; Phadannorg T; Permpoonsinsook M; Thinkhamrop B
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 15119720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assembly and clinical use of the XCP dental x-ray film holder and orientation devices in dentistry.
    Mamoun JS
    Dent Assist; 2011; 80(1):8, 10, 12-4 passim. PubMed ID: 21443076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pediatric bitewing film holder: preschoolers' acceptance and radiographs' diagnostic quality.
    Pierro VS; Barcelos R; de Souza IP; Raymundo RJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 18767515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alignment errors in bitewing radiographs using uncoupled positioning devices.
    Shrout MK; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 8508940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and validation of two new image receptor-holding devices for overlapping reduction of proximal surfaces in bitewing radiography: a preclinical study.
    Cascante-Sequeira D; Gaêta-Araujo H; Peroni LV; Oliveira-Santos C; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 May; 50(4):20200449. PubMed ID: 33353388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting the diagnostic quality of bitewing radiographs: a review.
    Chadwick BL; Dummer PH
    Br Dent J; 1998 Jan; 184(2):80-4; discussion 77. PubMed ID: 9489215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method to reduce interproximal overlapping and improve reproducibility of bitewing radiographs for use in clinical trials.
    McDonald SP
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1983 Oct; 11(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 6578897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of a samarium compound filter and E-speed film.
    Mauriello SM; Overman VP; Mann GB
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):769-73. PubMed ID: 9161270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of repeat bitewing radiographs determined by measurement of the distance between the amelocemental junction and the alveolar crest: an ex vivo study using human skulls.
    Bishop K; Dummer PM; Kingdon A; Newcombe RG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 8617391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of proximal carious lesions: two-film versus four-film bitewing radiography.
    Kaffe I; Gordon M; Laufer B; Littner MM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 May; 57(5):567-71. PubMed ID: 6587305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between bitewing radiographs taken with rectangular and circular collimators in UK military dental practices: a retrospective study.
    Parrott LA; Ng SY
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 21239573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation into the use of bitewing radiography in children in Greater Glasgow.
    Taylor GK; Macpherson LM
    Br Dent J; 2004 May; 196(9):563-8; discussion 541. PubMed ID: 15131628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the reproducibility of two bitewing techniques by means of a microdensitometric recording method.
    Beyer-Olsen EM; Eggen S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Jan; 55(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 6572343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.