353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20471313)
1. Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: comparison of tDCS and tRNS.
Ambrus GG; Paulus W; Antal A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 121(11):1908-14. PubMed ID: 20471313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes.
Ambrus GG; Antal A; Paulus W
Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Apr; 122(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 20980196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts tactile perception.
Rogalewski A; Breitenstein C; Nitsche MA; Paulus W; Knecht S
Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Jul; 20(1):313-6. PubMed ID: 15245504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex induces distinct changes in thermal and mechanical sensory percepts.
Bachmann CG; Muschinsky S; Nitsche MA; Rolke R; Magerl W; Treede RD; Paulus W; Happe S
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 121(12):2083-9. PubMed ID: 20570558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modulatory effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on laser-evoked potentials.
Csifcsak G; Antal A; Hillers F; Levold M; Bachmann CG; Happe S; Nitsche MA; Ellrich J; Paulus W
Pain Med; 2009 Jan; 10(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18823388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of transcranial electrical stimulation regimens for effects on inhibitory circuit activity in primary somatosensory cortex and tactile spatial discrimination performance.
Saito K; Otsuru N; Inukai Y; Miyaguchi S; Yokota H; Kojima S; Sasaki R; Onishi H
Behav Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 375():112168. PubMed ID: 31442547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pergolide increases the efficacy of cathodal direct current stimulation to reduce the amplitude of laser-evoked potentials in humans.
Terney D; Bergmann I; Poreisz C; Chaieb L; Boros K; Nitsche MA; Paulus W; Antal A
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2008 Jul; 36(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 18358692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modulating oscillatory brain activity correlates of behavioral inhibition using transcranial direct current stimulation.
Jacobson L; Ezra A; Berger U; Lavidor M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 May; 123(5):979-84. PubMed ID: 21995999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of timing in the induction of neuromodulation in perceptual learning by transcranial electric stimulation.
Pirulli C; Fertonani A; Miniussi C
Brain Stimul; 2013 Jul; 6(4):683-9. PubMed ID: 23369505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates chronic pain and reduces short intracortical inhibition.
Antal A; Terney D; Kühnl S; Paulus W
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2010 May; 39(5):890-903. PubMed ID: 20471549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving working memory: exploring the effect of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
Mulquiney PG; Hoy KE; Daskalakis ZJ; Fitzgerald PB
Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2384-9. PubMed ID: 21665534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modulatory effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on perception and pain thresholds in healthy volunteers.
Boggio PS; Zaghi S; Lopes M; Fregni F
Eur J Neurol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):1124-30. PubMed ID: 18717717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transcranial direct current stimulation priming of therapeutic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a pilot study.
Loo C; Martin D; Pigot M; Arul-Anandam P; Mitchell P; Sachdev P
J ECT; 2009 Dec; 25(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 19440158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time-dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the enhancement of working memory.
Ohn SH; Park CI; Yoo WK; Ko MH; Choi KP; Kim GM; Lee YT; Kim YH
Neuroreport; 2008 Jan; 19(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18281890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects.
Fertonani A; Ferrari C; Miniussi C
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Nov; 126(11):2181-8. PubMed ID: 25922128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The fade-in--short stimulation--fade out approach to sham tDCS--reliable at 1 mA for naïve and experienced subjects, but not investigators.
Ambrus GG; Al-Moyed H; Chaieb L; Sarp L; Antal A; Paulus W
Brain Stimul; 2012 Oct; 5(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 22405745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modulation of emotions associated with images of human pain using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Boggio PS; Zaghi S; Fregni F
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):212-7. PubMed ID: 18725237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhancement of precise hand movement by transcranial direct current stimulation.
Matsuo A; Maeoka H; Hiyamizu M; Shomoto K; Morioka S; Seki K
Neuroreport; 2011 Jan; 22(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 21150805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhancing language performance with non-invasive brain stimulation--a transcranial direct current stimulation study in healthy humans.
Sparing R; Dafotakis M; Meister IG; Thirugnanasambandam N; Fink GR
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):261-8. PubMed ID: 17804023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose response of somatosensory cortex repeated anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on vibrotactile detection: a randomized sham-controlled trial.
Folmli B; Turman B; Johnson P; Abbott A
J Neurophysiol; 2018 Aug; 120(2):610-616. PubMed ID: 29726731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
