89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20471581)
1. [Prostate biopsies endothelin-1 expression: pt3a stage prognostic factor?].
Perez T; Menard J; Joseph K; Birembaut P; Staerman F
Prog Urol; 2010 May; 20(5):364-8. PubMed ID: 20471581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endothelin-1: a predictor of extracapsular extension in clinically localized prostate cancer?
Menard J; Durlach A; Barbe C; Joseph K; Lorenzato M; Azemar MD; Perez T; Birembault P; Staerman F
BJU Int; 2011 Jul; 108(2 Pt 2):E104-9. PubMed ID: 21091977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Endothelin-1 and receptor A: predictive value for biochemical relapse on patients with advanced and metastatic prostate cancer].
Rotondo S; Menard J; Durlach A; Birembaut P; Staerman F
Prog Urol; 2012 Jan; 22(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 22196004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The outcome of patients with pathological Gleason score >or=8 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Rodriguez-Covarrubias F; Larre S; De La Taille A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17941921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction by quantitative histology of pathological stage in prostate cancer.
Pepe P; Galia A; Fraggetta F; Grasso G; Allegro R; Aragona F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2005 Apr; 31(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15780569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.
Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of percent positive prostate biopsies and perineural invasion with biochemical outcome after external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.
Wong WW; Schild SE; Vora SA; Halyard MY
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Sep; 60(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 15337536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perineural invasion as a predictor of biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy for select men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Wu Y; Chen MH; Nash M; Renshaw AA; Richie JP
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 11125380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early prostate cancer antigen expression in predicting presence of prostate cancer in men with histologically negative biopsies.
Hansel DE; DeMarzo AM; Platz EA; Jadallah S; Hicks J; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Netto GJ
J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1736-40. PubMed ID: 17437801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and pathologic features of prostate cancer detected after repeat false-negative biopsy in a screening population.
Steiner H; Moser P; Hager M; Berger AP; Klocker H; Spranger R; Rogatsch H; Bartsch G; Horninger W
Prostate; 2004 Feb; 58(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 14743467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration.
Master VA; Chi T; Simko JP; Weinberg V; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793. PubMed ID: 16217288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Villamón-Fort R; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM; Soriano-Sarriá P; Ramos-Soler D; Pastor-Hernández F; Gil-Salom M
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 17495491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perineural invasion and seminal vesicle involvement predict pelvic lymph node metastasis in men with localized carcinoma of the prostate.
Stone NN; Stock RG; Parikh D; Yeghiayan P; Unger P
J Urol; 1998 Nov; 160(5):1722-6. PubMed ID: 9783940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update.
Djavan B; Milani S; Remzi M
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():44-8; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 15780165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conventional assessment of needle biopsy specimens is more useful than digital image analysis of proliferation and DNA ploidy in prediction of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy.
Sengupta S; Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Zincke H; Myers RP; Riehle DL; Pankratz VS; Blute ML; Sebo TJ
Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 16844452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen.
Obek C; Louis P; Civantos F; Soloway MS
J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):494-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 9915434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
