These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20471638)

  • 21. Stochastic information transfer from cochlear implant electrodes to auditory nerve fibers.
    Gao X; Grayden DB; McDonnell MD
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Aug; 90(2):022722. PubMed ID: 25215773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 4. model development at low pulse rates: general model and application to individuals.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):15-30. PubMed ID: 19110049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spontaneous activity of auditory nerve fibers in the barn owl (Tyto alba): analyses of interspike interval distributions.
    Neubauer H; Köppl C; Heil P
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Jun; 101(6):3169-91. PubMed ID: 19357334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Simulation of the electrically stimulated cochlear neuron: modeling adaptation to trains of electric pulses.
    Woo J; Miller CA; Abbas PJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 May; 56(5):1348-59. PubMed ID: 19473930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Determinants of the spectrum of the neural electrical activity at the round window: transmitter release and neural depolarisation.
    Patuzzi RB; Brown DJ; McMahon CM; Halliday AF
    Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 190(1-2):87-108. PubMed ID: 15051132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. White-noise stimulation of the Hodgkin-Huxley model.
    Takahata T; Tanabe S; Pakdaman K
    Biol Cybern; 2002 May; 86(5):403-17. PubMed ID: 11984654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two distinct mechanisms shape the reliability of neural responses.
    Schreiber S; Samengo I; Herz AV
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2239-51. PubMed ID: 19193775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simulation of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.
    Rattay F
    Artif Organs; 1997 Mar; 21(3):213-5. PubMed ID: 9148708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of monophasic and biphasic electrical stimulation of nerve.
    Rubinstein JT; Miller CA; Mino H; Abbas PJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Oct; 48(10):1065-70. PubMed ID: 11585029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dynamical instability determines the effect of ongoing noise on neural firing.
    O'Gorman DE; White JA; Shera CA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 10(2):251-67. PubMed ID: 19308644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prediction and control of neural responses to pulsatile electrical stimulation.
    Campbell LJ; Sly DJ; O'Leary SJ
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Apr; 9(2):026023. PubMed ID: 22419164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of electrode position on spatiotemporal auditory nerve fiber responses: a 3D computational model study.
    Kang S; Chwodhury T; Moon IJ; Hong SH; Yang H; Won JH; Woo J
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():934382. PubMed ID: 25755675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15953524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of a purely conductance-based stochastic nerve fibre model as applied to compound models of populations of human auditory nerve fibres used in cochlear implant simulations.
    Badenhorst W; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
    Biol Cybern; 2017 Dec; 111(5-6):439-458. PubMed ID: 29063191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation of stimulus attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Smit JE; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun; 180(2):363-73. PubMed ID: 19464523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling electromagnetic fields detectability in a HH-like neuronal system: stochastic resonance and window behavior.
    Giannì M; Liberti M; Apollonio F; D'Inzeo G
    Biol Cybern; 2006 Feb; 94(2):118-27. PubMed ID: 16369796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Manifestations of dynamic coding of the amplitude-modulated sounds on the level of auditory nerve fibres].
    Rimskaia-Korsakova LK; Telepnev VN; Dubrovskiĭ NA
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2003 Jun; 89(6):700-14. PubMed ID: 12966708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simultaneous intracochlear stimulation based on channel interaction compensation: analysis and first results.
    Zierhofer CM; Schatzer R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jul; 55(7):1907-16. PubMed ID: 18595810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Noise enhances modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant listeners: stochastic resonance in a prosthetic sensory system?
    Chatterjee M; Robert ME
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Jun; 2(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 11550525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.