216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20472294)
1. Normal values for fundus perimetry with the microperimeter MP1.
Midena E; Vujosevic S; Cavarzeran F;
Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1571-6, 1576.e1. PubMed ID: 20472294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MP1 AND MAIA FUNDUS PERIMETRY IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS AFFECTED BY RETINAL DYSTROPHIES.
Parodi MB; Triolo G; Morales M; Borrelli E; Cicinelli MV; Cascavilla ML; Bandello F
Retina; 2015 Aug; 35(8):1662-9. PubMed ID: 26214316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability of the microperimeter MP-1.
Weingessel B; Sacu S; Vécsei-Marlovits PV; Weingessel A; Richter-Mueksch S; Schmidt-Erfurth U
Eye (Lond); 2009 May; 23(5):1052-8. PubMed ID: 18670459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving detection of mild loss of retinal light increment sensitivity at the posterior pole with the microperimeter MP1.
Bowl W; Lorenz B; Jäger M; Friedburg C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 54(7):4666-74. PubMed ID: 23716630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal modulation perimetry: the effects of aging and eccentricity on sensitivity in normals.
Casson EJ; Johnson CA; Nelson-Quigg JM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Oct; 34(11):3096-102. PubMed ID: 8407217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Macular automatic fundus perimetry threshold versus standard perimetry threshold.
Midena E; Radin PP; Convento E; Cavarzeran F
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 17294384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Test-retest variability of microperimetry using the Nidek MP1 in patients with macular disease.
Chen FK; Patel PJ; Xing W; Bunce C; Egan C; Tufail AT; Coffey PJ; Rubin GS; Da Cruz L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 50(7):3464-72. PubMed ID: 19324853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Values for macular perimetry using the MP-1 microperimeter in normal subjects.
Shah VA; Chalam KV
Ophthalmic Res; 2009; 41(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18849636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microperimeter MP1.
Shpak AA
Ophthalmology; 2011 Jun; 118(6):1224; author reply 1224-5. PubMed ID: 21640272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of retinal sensitivity measured with fundus-related microperimetry to visual acuity and retinal thickness in eyes with diabetic macular edema.
Okada K; Yamamoto S; Mizunoya S; Hoshino A; Arai M; Takatsuna Y
Eye (Lond); 2006 Jul; 20(7):805-9. PubMed ID: 16021181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Central field perimetry of discriminated targets: I. Results for normal individuals using high-contrast targets.
Yavuz GA; Unver YB; Bekiroglu N; Presti P; Sinclair SH
Eye (Lond); 2009 Nov; 23(11):2082-9. PubMed ID: 19648898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fundus-driven perimetry (microperimetry) compared to conventional static automated perimetry: similarities, differences, and clinical applications.
Acton JH; Greenstein VC
Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 24093180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A study on retinal light sensitivity of normal human visual fields].
Yu MB; Zhou WB; Ye TC
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Sep; 30(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 7805534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparative analysis of the results of microperimetry and conventional computed perimetry in health].
Shpak AA; Kachalina GF; Pedanova EK
Vestn Oftalmol; 2009; 125(3):31-4. PubMed ID: 19566046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adaptation mechanisms, eccentricity profiles, and clinical implementation of red-on-white perimetry.
Zele AJ; Dang TM; O'Loughlin RK; Guymer RH; Harper A; Vingrys AJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 May; 85(5):309-17. PubMed ID: 18451735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Light perception and flicker perimetry. Effect of refractive error, artificial media opacities and pupillary size].
Gleissner M; Lachenmayr BJ
Ophthalmologe; 1992 Apr; 89(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 1600326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microperimetry--comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope--fundus perimetry.
Rohrschneider K; Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 15672526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of macular function with retinal thickness in nonproliferative type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia.
Charbel Issa P; Helb HM; Holz FG; Scholl HP;
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 145(1):169-175. PubMed ID: 17981256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Points of a normal visual field are not statistically independent.
Lachenmayr BJ; Kiermeir U; Kojetinsky S
Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 May; 4(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 7663331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
