These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20472731)
1. Animal-to-animal variation in fecal microbial diversity among beef cattle. Durso LM; Harhay GP; Smith TP; Bono JL; Desantis TZ; Harhay DM; Andersen GL; Keen JE; Laegreid WW; Clawson ML Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 76(14):4858-62. PubMed ID: 20472731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Meta-analysis of Bacterial Diversity in the Feces of Cattle. Kim M; Wells JE Curr Microbiol; 2016 Feb; 72(2):145-151. PubMed ID: 26542532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Community structures of fecal bacteria in cattle from different animal feeding operations. Shanks OC; Kelty CA; Archibeque S; Jenkins M; Newton RJ; McLellan SL; Huse SM; Sogin ML Appl Environ Microbiol; 2011 May; 77(9):2992-3001. PubMed ID: 21378055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virulence-associated and antibiotic resistance genes of microbial populations in cattle feces analyzed using a metagenomic approach. Durso LM; Harhay GP; Bono JL; Smith TP J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Feb; 84(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 21167876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dysbiosis of the fecal microbiota in feedlot cattle with hemorrhagic diarrhea. Zeineldin M; Aldridge B; Lowe J Microb Pathog; 2018 Feb; 115():123-130. PubMed ID: 29275129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Propionibacterium acidipropionici P169 on the rumen and faecal microbiota of beef cattle fed a maize-based finishing diet. Azad E; Narvaez N; Derakhshani H; Allazeh AY; Wang Y; McAllister TA; Khafipour E Benef Microbes; 2017 Oct; 8(5):785-799. PubMed ID: 28856906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 16S rRNA gene-based analysis of fecal microbiota from preterm infants with and without necrotizing enterocolitis. Wang Y; Hoenig JD; Malin KJ; Qamar S; Petrof EO; Sun J; Antonopoulos DA; Chang EB; Claud EC ISME J; 2009 Aug; 3(8):944-54. PubMed ID: 19369970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diversity of the autochthonous colonic microbiota. Nava GM; Stappenbeck TS Gut Microbes; 2011; 2(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 21694499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microbial diversity and host-specific sequences of Canada goose feces. Lu J; Santo Domingo JW; Hill S; Edge TA Appl Environ Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 75(18):5919-26. PubMed ID: 19633110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of the fecal microbiome from non-human wild primates reveals species specific microbial communities. Yildirim S; Yeoman CJ; Sipos M; Torralba M; Wilson BA; Goldberg TL; Stumpf RM; Leigh SR; White BA; Nelson KE PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13963. PubMed ID: 21103066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clostridium difficile colonization in early infancy is accompanied by changes in intestinal microbiota composition. Rousseau C; Levenez F; Fouqueray C; Doré J; Collignon A; Lepage P J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 49(3):858-65. PubMed ID: 21177896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abrupt temporal fluctuations in the chicken fecal microbiota are explained by its gastrointestinal origin. Sekelja M; Rud I; Knutsen SH; Denstadli V; Westereng B; Næs T; Rudi K Appl Environ Microbiol; 2012 Apr; 78(8):2941-8. PubMed ID: 22307311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Sewage and Animal Fecal Microbiomes by Using Oligotyping Reveals Potential Human Fecal Indicators in Multiple Taxonomic Groups. Fisher JC; Eren AM; Green HC; Shanks OC; Morrison HG; Vineis JH; Sogin ML; McLellan SL Appl Environ Microbiol; 2015 Oct; 81(20):7023-33. PubMed ID: 26231648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of swine-specific PCR assays used for fecal source tracking and analysis of molecular diversity of swine-specific "bacteroidales" populations. Lamendella R; Santo Domingo JW; Yannarell AC; Ghosh S; Di Giovanni G; Mackie RI; Oerther DB Appl Environ Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 75(18):5787-96. PubMed ID: 19633126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unsuitability of quantitative Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene assays for discerning fecal contamination of drinking water. van der Wielen PW; Medema G Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 76(14):4876-81. PubMed ID: 20511431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molecular diversity of Bacteroidales in fecal and environmental samples and swine-associated subpopulations. Lamendella R; Li KC; Oerther D; Santo Domingo JW Appl Environ Microbiol; 2013 Feb; 79(3):816-24. PubMed ID: 23160126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Seasonal and regional diversity of maple sap microbiota revealed using community PCR fingerprinting and 16S rRNA gene clone libraries. Filteau M; Lagacé L; LaPointe G; Roy D Syst Appl Microbiol; 2010 Apr; 33(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 20202776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative abundance of Bacteroides spp. in stools and wastewaters as determined by hierarchical oligonucleotide primer extension. Hong PY; Wu JH; Liu WT Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 May; 74(9):2882-93. PubMed ID: 18344347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bacterial community analysis of beef cattle feedlots reveals that pen surface is distinct from feces. Durso LM; Harhay GP; Smith TP; Bono JL; DeSantis TZ; Clawson ML Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2011 May; 8(5):647-9. PubMed ID: 21214381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the diversity, abundance, and ecological distribution of members of candidate division SR1 reveals a high level of phylogenetic diversity but limited morphotypic diversity. Davis JP; Youssef NH; Elshahed MS Appl Environ Microbiol; 2009 Jun; 75(12):4139-48. PubMed ID: 19395567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]