BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20473190)

  • 1. Prediction modeling using EHR data: challenges, strategies, and a comparison of machine learning approaches.
    Wu J; Roy J; Stewart WF
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S106-13. PubMed ID: 20473190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of irregular and unbalanced data to predict diabetic nephropathy using visualization and feature selection methods.
    Cho BH; Yu H; Kim KW; Kim TH; Kim IY; Kim SI
    Artif Intell Med; 2008 Jan; 42(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 17997291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A decision support system to facilitate management of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Chu A; Ahn H; Halwan B; Kalmin B; Artifon EL; Barkun A; Lagoudakis MG; Kumar A
    Artif Intell Med; 2008 Mar; 42(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 18063351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting the graft survival for heart-lung transplantation patients: an integrated data mining methodology.
    Oztekin A; Delen D; Kong ZJ
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 Dec; 78(12):e84-96. PubMed ID: 19497782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rating organ failure via adverse events using data mining in the intensive care unit.
    Silva A; Cortez P; Santos MF; Gomes L; Neves J
    Artif Intell Med; 2008 Jul; 43(3):179-93. PubMed ID: 18486459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Support vector machine learning model for the prediction of sentinel node status in patients with cutaneous melanoma.
    Mocellin S; Ambrosi A; Montesco MC; Foletto M; Zavagno G; Nitti D; Lise M; Rossi CR
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Aug; 13(8):1113-22. PubMed ID: 16865598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation of expert rule bases, logistic regression, and non-linear machine learning techniques for predicting response to antiretroviral treatment.
    Prosperi MC; Altmann A; Rosen-Zvi M; Aharoni E; Borgulya G; Bazso F; Sönnerborg A; Schülter E; Struck D; Ulivi G; Vandamme AM; Vercauteren J; Zazzi M;
    Antivir Ther; 2009; 14(3):433-42. PubMed ID: 19474477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
    Zeng T; Liu J
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electronic medical records for clinical research: application to the identification of heart failure.
    Pakhomov S; Weston SA; Jacobsen SJ; Chute CG; Meverden R; Roger VL
    Am J Manag Care; 2007 Jun; 13(6 Part 1):281-8. PubMed ID: 17567225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multiple kernel support vector machine scheme for feature selection and rule extraction from gene expression data of cancer tissue.
    Chen Z; Li J; Wei L
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 Oct; 41(2):161-75. PubMed ID: 17851055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A controlled trial of including symptom data in computer-based care suggestions for managing patients with chronic heart failure.
    Subramanian U; Fihn SD; Weinberger M; Plue L; Smith FE; Udris EM; McDonell MB; Eckert GJ; Temkit M; Zhou XH; Chen L; Tierney WM
    Am J Med; 2004 Mar; 116(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 15006586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of machine learning techniques with classical statistical models in predicting health outcomes.
    Song X; Mitnitski A; Cox J; Rockwood K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):736-40. PubMed ID: 15360910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey.
    Poon EG; Wright A; Simon SR; Jenter CA; Kaushal R; Volk LA; Cleary PD; Singer JA; Tumolo AZ; Bates DW
    Med Care; 2010 Mar; 48(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 20125047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploiting missing clinical data in Bayesian network modeling for predicting medical problems.
    Lin JH; Haug PJ
    J Biomed Inform; 2008 Feb; 41(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 17625974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of payer mix on electronic health record adoption by physicians.
    Menachemi N; Matthews MC; Ford EW; Brooks RG
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2007; 32(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 17438394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simple point-of-care risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: the AMIS model.
    Kurz DJ; Bernstein A; Hunt K; Radovanovic D; Erne P; Siudak Z; Bertel O
    Heart; 2009 Apr; 95(8):662-8. PubMed ID: 19066189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of methylated CpGs in DNA sequences using a support vector machine.
    Bhasin M; Zhang H; Reinherz EL; Reche PA
    FEBS Lett; 2005 Aug; 579(20):4302-8. PubMed ID: 16051225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of machine learning and traditional classifiers in glaucoma diagnosis.
    Chan K; Lee TW; Sample PA; Goldbaum MH; Weinreb RN; Sejnowski TJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):963-74. PubMed ID: 12214886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing methods to identify general internal medicine clinic patients with chronic heart failure.
    Udris EM; Au DH; McDonell MB; Chen L; Martin DC; Tierney WM; Fihn SD
    Am Heart J; 2001 Dec; 142(6):1003-9. PubMed ID: 11717604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electronic health record components and the quality of care.
    Keyhani S; Hebert PL; Ross JS; Federman A; Zhu CW; Siu AL
    Med Care; 2008 Dec; 46(12):1267-72. PubMed ID: 19300317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.