These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20473596)

  • 1. Modular necks improve the range of hip motion in cases with excessively anteverted or retroverted femurs in THA.
    Matsushita A; Nakashima Y; Fujii M; Sato T; Iwamoto Y
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3342-7. PubMed ID: 20473596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does acetabular retroversion affect range of motion after total hip arthroplasty?
    Incavo SJ; Gold JE; Exaltacion JJ; Thompson MT; Noble PC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Jan; 469(1):218-24. PubMed ID: 20665139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modular neck for prevention of prosthetic impingement in cases with excessively anteverted femur.
    Miki H; Sugano N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Nov; 26(9):944-9. PubMed ID: 21680069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.
    Widmer KH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
    Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.
    Widmer KH; Zurfluh B
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Range of Motion to Impingement Curves Create a New Patient-Specific Impingement-Free Zone for Acetabular Cup Placement.
    McCarthy TF; Thompson MT; Nevelos J; Salem HS; Naylor BH; Mont MA
    Surg Technol Int; 2021 May; 38():400-406. PubMed ID: 33565600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Femoral anteversion, femoral offset, and abductor lever arm after total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral neck system.
    Sakai T; Sugano N; Ohzono K; Nishii T; Haraguchi K; Yoshikawa H
    J Orthop Sci; 2002; 7(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 11819134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.
    D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of range of motion simulated with a patient-specific three-dimensional simulation analysis on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.
    Mitsutake R; Tanino H; Ito H
    Hip Int; 2023 Mar; 33(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 34538126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral anteversion in THA and its lack of correlation with native acetabular anteversion.
    Bargar WL; Jamali AA; Nejad AH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 19714389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.
    Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acetabular component positioning using anatomic landmarks of the acetabulum.
    Ha YC; Yoo JJ; Lee YK; Kim JY; Koo KH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 470(12):3515-23. PubMed ID: 22777589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The combined anteversion technique for acetabular component anteversion.
    Amuwa C; Dorr LD
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1068-70. PubMed ID: 18534533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.
    Ohmori T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Taga T; Hasegawa K; Inoue D; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Yoshitani J; Ueno T; Tsuchiya H
    Int Orthop; 2018 May; 42(5):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 28990125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The association between Femoral Tilt and impingement-free range-of-motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Renkawitz T; Haimerl M; Dohmen L; Gneiting S; Lechler P; Woerner M; Springorum HR; Weber M; Sussmann P; Sendtner E; Grifka J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 May; 13():65. PubMed ID: 22559740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing femoral anteversion and offset after total hip arthroplasty, using a modular femoral neck system: an experimental study.
    Sakai T; Sugano N; Nishii T; Haraguchi K; Ochi T; Ohzono K
    J Orthop Sci; 2000; 5(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 11180907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Periacetabular osteotomy restores the typically excessive range of motion in dysplastic hips with a spherical head.
    Steppacher SD; Zurmühle CA; Puls M; Siebenrock KA; Millis MB; Kim YJ; Tannast M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1404-16. PubMed ID: 25488403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Even the Intraoperative Knowledge of Femoral Stem Anteversion Cannot Prevent Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Weber M; Woerner ML; Sendtner E; Völlner F; Grifka J; Renkawitz TF
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2514-2519. PubMed ID: 27236745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of femoral bowing on range of motion after total hip arthroplasty.
    Akiyama K; Shibuya T
    Int Orthop; 2018 Aug; 42(8):1795-1802. PubMed ID: 29275431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.