343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2047381)
21. Ploidy determination on histologic sections of breast cancer specimens by image analysis using mathematical correction algorithms.
Gschwendtner A; Mairinger T
Mod Pathol; 1997 Aug; 10(8):751-61. PubMed ID: 9267816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. DNA image cytometric analysis of paraffin-embedded sections of small renal cortical neoplasms.
Farnsworth WV; DeRose PB; Cohen C
Cytometry; 1994 Dec; 18(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 7895529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Determination of DNA ploidy in archival tissue from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using flow and image cytometry.
Zbieranowski I; Le Riche JC; Palcic B; Gascoyne R; Connors J
Anal Cell Pathol; 1992 Jul; 4(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 1390299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Relationships between image cytometric DNA index, proliferation fraction and multiploidy and conventional nuclear grade in breast carcinoma.
Smith FB; Zappi ME
Mod Pathol; 1993 Sep; 6(5):606-11. PubMed ID: 7504261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. DNA ploidy and proliferation heterogeneity in human prostate cancers.
Shankey TV; Jin JK; Dougherty S; Flanigan RC; Graham S; Pyle JM
Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 21(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 8529468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Carcinoma in situ of the female breast. A clinico-pathological, immunohistological, and DNA ploidy study.
Ottesen GL
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (108):1-67. PubMed ID: 12874968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms of fresh breast cancer material.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Jan; 8(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 7734408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative analysis of DNA content estimated by flow and image cytometry in breast tumor samples.
Jaszcz-Gruchała A; Swiatkiewicz I; Lackowska B; Gruchała A; Niezabitowski A
Pol J Pathol; 2001; 52(1-2):15-9. PubMed ID: 11505676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ploidy studies by image analysis on fine needle aspirates of the breast.
Taylor SR; Zachariah S; Chakraborty S; Overstreet J; Ramzy I; Mody DR
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):923-8. PubMed ID: 8249514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. DNA ploidy of ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma of the jaws. Analysis by image and flow cytometry.
Müller S; DeRose PB; Cohen C
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Nov; 117(11):1126-31. PubMed ID: 8239934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment and significance of diploid-range epithelial populations in DNA aneuploid breast carcinomas using multi-parametric flow cytometry.
Visscher DW; Sochacki P; Ottosen S; Wykes S; Crissman JD
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Jun; 8(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 7577742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. DNA-ploidy studies on cytological preparations from breast cancers by image analysis: comparison with Feulgen staining performed in destained Papanicolaou slides.
Sidoni A; Cavaliere A; Alunno P; Bucciarelli E
Cytometry; 1996 Dec; 26(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 8979029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multiparameter analysis of DNA content and cytokeratin expression in breast carcinoma by laser scanning cytometry.
Clatch RJ; Walloch JL; Foreman JR; Kamentsky LA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 9199623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multiparametric deoxyribonucleic acid and cell cycle analysis of breast carcinomas by flow cytometry. Clinicopathologic correlations.
Visscher DW; Zarbo RJ; Jacobsen G; Kambouris A; Talpos G; Sakr W; Crissman JD
Lab Invest; 1990 Mar; 62(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 1690316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development of a flow cytometric method to determine DNA ploidy of oesophageal cancer cells obtained by forceps biopsy samples during oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy.
Rickes S; Hauptmann S; Flath B; Abbenseth R; Zwiebel FM; Possinger K
Onkologie; 2003 Feb; 26(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12624515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [DNA ploidy and prognosis of cardia and stomach carcinomas. A comparative flow and image cytometric analysis pf paraffin-embedded tumor sections].
Mellin W; Heidl G; Keller R; Reers B; Sasse W
Zentralbl Pathol; 1994 Feb; 139(6):449-55. PubMed ID: 7512824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Flow cytometry vs. Ki67 labelling index in breast cancer: a prospective evaluation of 181 cases.
Martínez-Arribas F; Núñez MJ; Piqueras V; Lucas AR; Sánchez J; Tejerina A; Schneider J
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(1A):295-8. PubMed ID: 12017306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intratumoral heterogeneity of DNA ploidy in breast carcinomas: a flow cytometric assessment of sampling techniques.
Schvimer M; Lash RH; Katzin WE
Cytometry; 1995 Dec; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 8749779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reproducibility in DNA flow cytometric analysis of breast cancer: comparison of 12 laboratories' results for 67 sample homogenates.
Baldetorp B; Bendahl PO; Fernö M; Alanen K; Delle U; Falkmer U; Hansson-Aggesjö B; Höckenström T; Lindgren A; Mossberg L
Cytometry; 1995 Jun; 22(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 7587742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. DNA content in renal cell carcinoma. A clinical study with special reference to tumor heterogeneity and prognosis.
Ljungberg B
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1986; 100():1-47. PubMed ID: 3472340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
