These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20476506)

  • 1. Using 'subcement' to simulate the long-term fatigue response of cemented femoral stems in a cadaver model: could a novel preclinical screening test have caught the Exeter matt problem?
    Race A; Miller MA; Mann KA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(4):585-97. PubMed ID: 20476506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polished Cemented Femoral Stems Have a Lower Rate of Revision Than Matt Finished Cemented Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 96,315 Cemented Femoral Stems.
    Hoskins W; van Bavel D; Lorimer M; de Steiger RN
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1472-1476. PubMed ID: 29310918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polished vs rough femoral components in grade A and grade C-2 cement mantles.
    Duffy GP; Lozynsky AJ; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct; 21(7):1054-63. PubMed ID: 17027551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cement-implant interface gaps explain the poor results of CMW3 for femoral stem fixation: A cadaver study of migration, fatigue and mantle morphology.
    Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Oct; 76(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 16263615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Initial stability of cemented femoral stems as a function of surface finish, collar, and stem size.
    Ebramzadeh E; Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Buhari CF; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 14711952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
    Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The skeletal response to matt and polished cemented femoral stems.
    Barker DS; Wang AW; Yeo MF; Nawana NS; Brumby SA; Pearcy MJ; Howie DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Nov; 82(8):1182-8. PubMed ID: 11132284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems.
    Howie DW; Middleton RG; Costi K
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 Jul; 80(4):573-6. PubMed ID: 9699814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface roughness of debonded straight-tapered stems in cemented THA reduces subsidence but not cement damage.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    Biomaterials; 1998 Oct; 19(19):1773-9. PubMed ID: 9856588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of femoral neck length, stem size, and body weight on strains in the proximal cement mantle.
    Harrington MA; O'Connor DO; Lozynsky AJ; Kovach I; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 11940617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of design changes on cemented tapered femoral stem fixation.
    Middleton RG; Howie DW; Costi K; Sharpe P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):47-56. PubMed ID: 9917590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between cement fatigue damage and implant surface finish in proximal femoral prostheses.
    Lennon AB; McCormack BA; Prendergast PJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2003 Dec; 25(10):833-41. PubMed ID: 14630471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional measurement of cemented femoral stem stability: an in vitro cadaver study.
    Speirs AD; Slomczykowski MA; Orr TE; Siebenrock K; Nolte LP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2000 May; 15(4):248-55. PubMed ID: 10675665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stem subsidence of polished and rough double-taper stems: in vitro mechanical effects on the cement-bone interface.
    Kaneuji A; Yamada K; Hirosaki K; Takano M; Matsumoto T
    Acta Orthop; 2009 Jun; 80(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 19421909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface finish of the Exeter Trauma Stem: a cause for concern?
    Petheram TG; Bone M; Joyce TJ; Serrano-Pedraza I; Reed MR; Partington PF
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Feb; 95-B(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 23365024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro measurement of interface micromotion and crack in cemented total hip arthroplasty systems with different surface roughness.
    Choi D; Park Y; Yoon YS; Masri BA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jan; 25(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 19744754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early cement damage around a femoral stem is concentrated at the cement/bone interface.
    Race A; Miller MA; Ayers DC; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2003 Apr; 36(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 12600339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with essentially the same geometry.
    Collis DK; Mohler CG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):586-92. PubMed ID: 11940619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.