These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20476507)

  • 1. The effect of load application rate on the biomechanics of synthetic femurs.
    Zdero R; Shah S; Mosli M; Schemitsch EH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(4):599-605. PubMed ID: 20476507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The biomechanical effect of changes in cancellous bone density on synthetic femur behaviour.
    Nicayenzi B; Shah S; Schemitsch EH; Bougherara H; Zdero R
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Nov; 225(11):1050-60. PubMed ID: 22292203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of cortex thickness on intact femur biomechanics: a comparison of finite element analysis with synthetic femurs.
    Zdero R; Bougherara H; Dubov A; Shah S; Zalzal P; Mahfud A; Schemitsch EH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(7):831-40. PubMed ID: 20839651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural properties of fourth-generation composite femurs and tibias.
    Heiner AD
    J Biomech; 2008 Nov; 41(15):3282-4. PubMed ID: 18829031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical evaluation of large-size fourth-generation composite femur and tibia models.
    Gardner MP; Chong AC; Pollock AG; Wooley PH
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 38(3):613-20. PubMed ID: 20049637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A biomechanical comparison of four different cementless press-fit stems used in revision surgery for total knee replacements.
    Zdero R; Saidi K; Mason SA; Schemitsch EH; Naudie DD
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Nov; 226(11):848-57. PubMed ID: 23185955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The biomechanical effect of proximal tumor defect location on femur pathological fractures.
    Sivasundaram R; Shah S; Ahmadi S; Wunder JS; Schemitsch EH; Ferguson PC; Zdero R
    J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Aug; 27(8):e174-80. PubMed ID: 23249892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical screw purchase in synthetic and human femurs.
    Zdero R; Elfallah K; Olsen M; Schemitsch EH
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Sep; 131(9):094503. PubMed ID: 19725700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The biomechanics of the T2 femoral nailing system: a comparison of synthetic femurs withfinite element analysis.
    Bougherara H; Zdero R; Miric M; Shah S; Hardisty M; Zalzal P; Schemitsch EH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Apr; 223(3):303-14. PubMed ID: 19405436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical measurements of axial crush injury to the distal condyles of human and synthetic femurs.
    Crookshank M; Coquim J; Olsen M; Schemitsch EH; Bougherara H; Zdero R
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Apr; 226(4):320-9. PubMed ID: 22611872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
    O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cancellous bone screw purchase: a comparison of synthetic femurs, human femurs, and finite element analysis.
    Zdero R; Olsen M; Bougherara H; Schemitsch EH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Nov; 222(8):1175-83. PubMed ID: 19143412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability of digital image correlation for measurement of surface strains in composite long bones.
    Väänänen SP; Amin Yavari S; Weinans H; Zadpoor AA; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1928-32. PubMed ID: 23791085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical stress maps of an artificial femur obtained using a new infrared thermography technique validated by strain gages.
    Shah S; Bougherara H; Schemitsch EH; Zdero R
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Dec; 34(10):1496-502. PubMed ID: 22430061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of torsional loading on compressive fatigue behaviour of trabecular bone.
    Fatihhi SJ; Rabiatul AA; Harun MN; Kadir MR; Kamarul T; Syahrom A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Feb; 54():21-32. PubMed ID: 26410762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures.
    Otto RJ; Moed BR; Bledsoe JG
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 19897986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical evaluation of fracture fixation constructs using a variable-angle locked periprosthetic femur plate system.
    Hoffmann MF; Burgers TA; Mason JJ; Williams BO; Sietsema DL; Jones CB
    Injury; 2014 Jul; 45(7):1035-41. PubMed ID: 24680467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models.
    Cristofolini L; Viceconti M; Cappello A; Toni A
    J Biomech; 1996 Apr; 29(4):525-35. PubMed ID: 8964782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cortical screw pullout strength and effective shear stress in synthetic third generation composite femurs.
    Zdero R; Rose S; Schemitsch EH; Papini M
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Apr; 129(2):289-93. PubMed ID: 17408335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.