These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20477598)
1. Gaining perspective on the allergenicity assessment of genetically modified food crops. Goodman RE; Hefle SL Expert Rev Clin Immunol; 2005 Nov; 1(4):561-78. PubMed ID: 20477598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools. Ladics GS; Selgrade MK Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Will genetically modified foods be allergenic? Taylor SL; Hefle SL J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 May; 107(5):765-71. PubMed ID: 11344340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests. Betz FS; Hammond BG; Fuchs RL Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Oct; 32(2):156-73. PubMed ID: 11067772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risks of allergic reactions to biotech proteins in foods: perception and reality. Lehrer SB; Bannon GA Allergy; 2005 May; 60(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 15813800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing genetically modified crops to minimize the risk of increased food allergy: a review. Goodman RE; Hefle SL; Taylor SL; van Ree R Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2005 Jun; 137(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 15947471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current codex guidelines for assessment of potential protein allergenicity. Ladics GS Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S20-3. PubMed ID: 18708115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of endogenous allergens for the safety evaluation of genetically engineered food crops: review of potential risks, test methods, examples and relevance. Goodman RE; Panda R; Ariyarathna H J Agric Food Chem; 2013 Sep; 61(35):8317-32. PubMed ID: 23848840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the potential allergenicity of a Milk Basic Protein fraction. Goodman RE; Taylor SL; Yamamura J; Kobayashi T; Kawakami H; Kruger CL; Thompson GP Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Oct; 45(10):1787-94. PubMed ID: 17482742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Animal models for assessment of GMO allergenicity: advantages and limitations]. Adel-Patient K; Wal JM Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Mar; 36(3):88-91. PubMed ID: 15137477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performing IgE serum testing due to bioinformatics matches in the allergenicity assessment of GM crops. Goodman RE Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S24-34. PubMed ID: 18715545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of allergenicity of genetically modified soybean protein extract in a murine model of oral allergen-specific sensitization. Gizzarelli F; Corinti S; Barletta B; Iacovacci P; Brunetto B; Butteroni C; Afferni C; Onori R; Miraglia M; Panzini G; Di Felice G; Tinghino R Clin Exp Allergy; 2006 Feb; 36(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 16433863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Presence of potential allergy-related linear epitopes in novel proteins from conventional crops and the implication for the safety assessment of these crops with respect to the current testing of genetically modified crops. Kleter GA; Peijnenburg AA Plant Biotechnol J; 2003 Sep; 1(5):371-80. PubMed ID: 17166136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetically modified plants and food hypersensitivity diseases: usage and implications of experimental models for risk assessment. Prescott VE; Hogan SP Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Aug; 111(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 16364445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops--what makes sense? Goodman RE; Vieths S; Sampson HA; Hill D; Ebisawa M; Taylor SL; van Ree R Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18183024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Constantly evolving safety assessment protocols for GM foods. Sesikeran B; Vasanthi S Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():241-4. PubMed ID: 18296346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Food additives and genetically modified food--a risk for allergic patients?]. Wüthrich B Praxis (Bern 1994); 1999 Apr; 88(14):609-14, 616-8. PubMed ID: 10321121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety assessment considerations for food and feed derived from plants with genetic modifications that modulate endogenous gene expression and pathways. Kier LD; Petrick JS Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Aug; 46(8):2591-605. PubMed ID: 18602733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nutritional and safety assessment of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology--case studies by the International Food Biotechnology Committee of ILSI. Glenn KC Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():229-32. PubMed ID: 18296343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]