These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Long negative feedback loop enhances period tunability of biological oscillators. Maeda K; Kurata H J Theor Biol; 2018 Mar; 440():21-31. PubMed ID: 29253507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Entraining synthetic genetic oscillators. Wagemakers A; Buldú JM; Sanjuán MA; de Luis O; Izquierdo A; Coloma A Chaos; 2009 Sep; 19(3):033139. PubMed ID: 19792019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simple negative interaction in the positive transcriptional feedback of a single gene is sufficient to produce reliable oscillations. Miró-Bueno JM; Rodríguez-Patón A PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27414. PubMed ID: 22205920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Slow activator degradation reduces the robustness of a coupled feedback loop oscillator. Sayut DJ; Sun L Mol Biosyst; 2010 Aug; 6(8):1469-74. PubMed ID: 20505881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative analysis of synthetic genetic oscillators. Purcell O; Savery NJ; Grierson CS; di Bernardo M J R Soc Interface; 2010 Nov; 7(52):1503-24. PubMed ID: 20591848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Independent control of amplitude and period in a synthetic oscillator circuit with modified repressilator. Zhang F; Sun Y; Zhang Y; Shen W; Wang S; Ouyang Q; Luo C Commun Biol; 2022 Jan; 5(1):23. PubMed ID: 35017621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analytical study of robustness of a negative feedback oscillator by multiparameter sensitivity. Maeda K; Kurata H BMC Syst Biol; 2014; 8 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S1. PubMed ID: 25605374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robust network topologies for generating oscillations with temperature-independent periods. Wu L; Ouyang Q; Wang H PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171263. PubMed ID: 28152061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multi-functional synthetic gene network: a frequency multiplier, oscillator and switch. Purcell O; di Bernardo M; Grierson CS; Savery NJ PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16140. PubMed ID: 21359152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Growth-rate-dependent dynamics of a bacterial genetic oscillator. Osella M; Lagomarsino MC Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Jan; 87(1):012726. PubMed ID: 23410378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling the effect of cell division on genetic oscillators. Gonze D J Theor Biol; 2013 May; 325():22-33. PubMed ID: 23434891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computational Re-design of Synthetic Genetic Oscillators for Independent Amplitude and Frequency Modulation. Tomazou M; Barahona M; Polizzi KM; Stan GB Cell Syst; 2018 Apr; 6(4):508-520.e5. PubMed ID: 29680377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-modality in gene regulatory networks with slow promoter kinetics. Ali Al-Radhawi M; Del Vecchio D; Sontag ED PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Feb; 15(2):e1006784. PubMed ID: 30779734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Entrainment of a population of synthetic genetic oscillators. Mondragón-Palomino O; Danino T; Selimkhanov J; Tsimring L; Hasty J Science; 2011 Sep; 333(6047):1315-1319. PubMed ID: 21885786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]