These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20478322)

  • 21. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Peripherally presented emotional scenes: a spatiotemporal analysis of early ERP responses.
    Rigoulot S; Delplanque S; Despretz P; Defoort-Dhellemmes S; Honoré J; Sequeira H
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Jun; 20(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 18335307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Deafness and visual enumeration: not all aspects of attention are modified by deafness.
    Hauser PC; Dye MW; Boutla M; Green CS; Bavelier D
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1153():178-87. PubMed ID: 17467671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional enhancements and deficits in deaf populations: an integrative review.
    Dye MW; Bavelier D
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2010; 28(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 20404407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus.
    Castro-Barros BA; Righi LL; Grechi G; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 17961895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contingent capture of involuntary visual spatial attention does not differ between normally hearing children and proficient cochlear implant users.
    Kamke MR; Van Luyn J; Constantinescu G; Harris J
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(6):799-811. PubMed ID: 25201816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hemispheric asymmetries in categorical perception of orientation in infants and adults.
    Franklin A; Catherwood D; Alvarez J; Axelsson E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 20519136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reorganization of neural systems mediating peripheral visual selective attention in the deaf: An optical imaging study.
    Seymour JL; Low KA; Maclin EL; Chiarelli AM; Mathewson KE; Fabiani M; Gratton G; Dye MW
    Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 343():162-175. PubMed ID: 27668836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differential frontal activation during exogenous and endogenous orientation of visuospatial attention. A near-infrared spectroscopy study.
    Takahashi M; Ikegami M
    Neuropsychobiology; 2008; 58(2):55-64. PubMed ID: 18832860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spatial auditory compensation in early-blind humans: involvement of eye movements and/or attention orienting?
    Després O; Candas V; Dufour A
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(13):1955-62. PubMed ID: 16168735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interaction between allocentric and egocentric reference frames in deaf and hearing populations.
    Zhang M; Tan X; Shen L; Wang A; Geng S; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Feb; 54():68-76. PubMed ID: 24361477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement.
    Cattani A; Clibbens J; Perfect TJ
    Neuropsychology; 2007 Jan; 21(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 17201534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Competitive interactions of attentional resources in early visual cortex during sustained visuospatial attention within or between visual hemifields: evidence for the different-hemifield advantage.
    Walter S; Quigley C; Mueller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 May; 26(5):938-54. PubMed ID: 24345166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Response bias reveals enhanced attention to inferior visual field in signers of American Sign Language.
    Dye MW; Seymour JL; Hauser PC
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):1067-76. PubMed ID: 26708522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Task-relevance modulates the effects of peripheral distractors.
    Lichtenstein-Vidne L; Henik A; Safadi Z
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1216-26. PubMed ID: 17676554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Distance and ratio effects in the flanker task are due to different mechanisms.
    Mattler U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1745-63. PubMed ID: 16945858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.