These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2047867)

  • 1. Did Imanishi-Kari get a fair "trial"?
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Jun; 252(5013):1607. PubMed ID: 2047867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Imanishi-Kari affair. Baltimore declares O'Toole mistaken.
    Baltimore D
    Nature; 1991 May; 351(6325):341-3. PubMed ID: 2034280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientists get mad at OSI. Richards Panel: out of the loop?
    Palca J
    Science; 1991 Jun; 252(5013):1606-7. PubMed ID: 2047866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imanishi-Kari case: ORI finds fraud.
    Stone R; Marshall E
    Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5190):1468-9. PubMed ID: 7985007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imanishi-Kari ruling slams ORI.
    Kaiser J; Marshall E
    Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5270):1864-5. PubMed ID: 8658151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo.
    Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Appeals board exonerates Baltimore, Imanishi-Kari.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1996 Jul 24-31; 276(4):266. PubMed ID: 8656524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NIH misconduct procedures: effect of new ruling.
    Hallum JV; Hadley SW
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(4999):1296. PubMed ID: 2003214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What next in the Gallo case?
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Nov; 254(5034):944-5. PubMed ID: 1948080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. American scientist who found H.I.V. is investigated anew.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Mar; ():A1, B9. PubMed ID: 11646925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imanishi-Kari case. Marathon hearing gets under way.
    Mervis J
    Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5217):1561. PubMed ID: 7777851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NIH panel finds no fraud in Cell paper but cites errors.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1988 Dec; 242(4885):1499. PubMed ID: 3201234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NIH takes heat for lax investigation.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(4999):1305. PubMed ID: 2003215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collins' student sanctioned over 'most severe' case of fraud.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6640):313. PubMed ID: 9237737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Baltimore dispute.
    Sibbison JB
    Lancet; 1989 May; 1(8647):1148-9. PubMed ID: 2566100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.