249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20479192)
1. A robust approach for analyzing unbalanced factorial designs with fixed levels.
Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP
Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):607-17. PubMed ID: 20479192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robust tests for multivariate factorial designs under heteroscedasticity.
Vallejo G; Ato M
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):471-89. PubMed ID: 21994181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A practical method for analyzing factorial designs with heteroscedastic data.
Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP; Livacic-Rojas PE
Psychol Rep; 2008 Jun; 102(3):643-56. PubMed ID: 18763432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances.
Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19577012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New heterogeneous test statistics for the unbalanced fixed-effect nested design.
Guo JH; Billard L; Luh WM
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):259-76. PubMed ID: 21492132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tests for inter-subject and total variabilities under crossover designs.
Lee Y; Shao J; Chow SC; Wang H
J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):503-34. PubMed ID: 12477072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methods for testing equality of means of health care costs in a paired design study.
Zhou XH; Li C; Gao S; Tierney WM
Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(11):1703-20. PubMed ID: 11391697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Power analyses for correlations from clustered study designs.
Tu XM; Kowalski J; Crits-Christoph P; Gallop R
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2587-606. PubMed ID: 16025545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of permutation and mixed-model regression methods for the analysis of simulated data in the context of a group-randomized trial.
Murray DM; Hannan PJ; Pals SP; McCowen RG; Baker WL; Blitstein JL
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):375-88. PubMed ID: 16143991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample size planning with the cost constraint for testing superiority and equivalence of two independent groups.
Guo JH; Chen HJ; Luh WM
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):439-61. PubMed ID: 20704777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Monte Carlo investigation of homogeneity tests of the odds ratio under various sample size configurations.
Jones MP; O'Gorman TW; Lemke JH; Woolson RF
Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):171-81. PubMed ID: 2720050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Generalization of the Brown-Forsythe approach to factorial designs].
Vallejo Seco G; Fernández García MP; Livacic Rojas PE
Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):969-73. PubMed ID: 18940112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal designs for estimating and testing interaction among multiple loci in complex traits by a Gibbs sampler.
Lee C; Kim Y
Genomics; 2008 Dec; 92(6):446-51. PubMed ID: 18786631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Monte Carlo evaluation of three statistical methods used in path analysis.
McGue M; Wette R; Rao DC
Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(2):129-55. PubMed ID: 3582958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment on homogeneity tests for kappa statistics under equal prevalence across studies in reliability.
Nam JM
Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1521-31. PubMed ID: 16220477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detecting a lack of association: an equivalence testing approach.
Goertzen JR; Cribbie RA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):527-37. PubMed ID: 20030968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
