These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20479193)

  • 1. Hypothesis testing for coefficient alpha: an SEM approach.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; García-Forero C; Gallardo-Pujol D
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):618-25. PubMed ID: 20479193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing hypotheses involving Cronbach's alpha using marginal models.
    Kuijpers RE; van der Ark LA; Croon MA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):503-20. PubMed ID: 23663052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applying the permutation test to factorial designs.
    Mewhort DJ; Johns BT; Kelly MA
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 20479168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Synthesizer 1.0: a varying-coefficient meta-analytic tool.
    Krizan Z
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):863-70. PubMed ID: 20805608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the performance of different procedures for constructing confidence intervals for coefficient alpha: a simulation study.
    Cui Y; Li J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):467-98. PubMed ID: 22295951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6.
    Tashakor E; Chinchilli VM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(1):174-188. PubMed ID: 29953327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of equivalence using a concordance correlation coefficient in a repeated measurements design.
    Quiroz J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):913-28. PubMed ID: 16279351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability.
    Peterson RA; Kim Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jan; 98(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 23127213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model-free tests of equality in binary data under an incomplete block design.
    Lui KJ; Zhu L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1160-1168. PubMed ID: 29452049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the impact of observation errors on the statistical performance of network-based diffusion analysis.
    Franz M; Nunn CL
    Learn Behav; 2010 Aug; 38(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 20628162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating latent constructs with item response models: a MATLAB IRTm toolbox.
    Braeken J; Tuerlinckx F
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1127-37. PubMed ID: 19897820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Asymptotic power calculations: description, examples, computer code.
    Brown BW; Lovato J; Russell K
    Stat Med; 1999 Nov; 18(22):3137-51. PubMed ID: 10544312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating confidence intervals for eigenvalues in exploratory factor analysis.
    Larsen R; Warne RT
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):871-6. PubMed ID: 20805609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An effect size index for comparing two independent alpha coefficients.
    Liu HY; Weng LJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):385-400. PubMed ID: 18573226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of task structure on diffusion dynamics: Implications for diffusion curve and network-based analyses.
    Hoppitt W; Kandler A; Kendal JR; Laland KN
    Learn Behav; 2010 Aug; 38(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 20628163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Getting more from accuracy and response time data: methods for fitting the linear ballistic accumulator.
    Donkin C; Averell L; Brown S; Heathcote A
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1095-110. PubMed ID: 19897817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonparametric tests for equality of psychometric functions.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2226-2255. PubMed ID: 29218586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing standardized coefficients in structural equation modeling: a model reparameterization approach.
    Kwan JL; Chan W
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):730-45. PubMed ID: 21512876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unadjusted Bivariate Two-Group Comparisons: When Simpler is Better.
    Vetter TR; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):338-342. PubMed ID: 29189214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two confidence interval approaches on the dependability coefficient in a two-factor crossed design.
    Ting N; Cappelleri JC; Bushmakin AG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):610-24. PubMed ID: 20183429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.