These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20479212)

  • 1. Exploring methods to investigate sentencing decisions.
    Merrall EL; Dhami MK; Bird SM
    Eval Rev; 2010 Jun; 34(3):185-219. PubMed ID: 20479212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experiences of Sentencing and the Pains of Punishment: Prisoners' Perspectives.
    Atkins D; Maguire N; Cleere G
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2023 Jan; ():306624X221148127. PubMed ID: 36655790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crime and punishment in Saudi Arabia: Lashing, imprisonment, and other unusual punishments.
    Boateng FD; Pryce DK; Alotaibi HA
    Child Abuse Negl; 2023 Jan; 135():105948. PubMed ID: 36395699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Life-sentenced juveniles: Public perceptions of risk and need for incarceration.
    Heilbrun K; Durham K; Thornewill A; Schiedel R; Pietruszka V; Phillips S; Locklair B; Thomas J
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Sep; 36(5):587-596. PubMed ID: 30298613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between victim impact statements and judicial decision making: An archival analysis of sentencing outcomes.
    Dufour GK; Ternes M; Stinson V
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Aug; 47(4):484-498. PubMed ID: 37347897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of information about sentencing decisions on public attitudes toward the criminal justice system.
    St Amand MD; Zamble E
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):515-28. PubMed ID: 11688371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reactions to mandatory sentences in relation to the ethnic identity and criminal history of the offender.
    Feather NT; Souter J
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Aug; 26(4):417-38. PubMed ID: 12182531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prison sentencing increases the risk of unemployment among illegal heroin users in Taiwan.
    Lee CT; Huang CM; Chang LC; Wang SW; Hsu HP; Liao JY; Guo JL
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2020 Oct; 15(1):77. PubMed ID: 33046089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Drug offence sentencing practices in the United States of America.
    Weissman JC
    Bull Narc; 1984; 36(3):27-41. PubMed ID: 6570649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of Juror Decision Making in Race-Based and Sexual Orientation-Based Hate Crime Cases.
    Gamblin BW; Kehn A; Vanderzanden K; Ruthig JC; Jones KM; Long BL
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Apr; 36(7-8):3231-3256. PubMed ID: 29766757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cooperative guardian offenders and sentencing outcomes: Evidence from criminal sentencing documents of child trafficking crime in China.
    Xin Y; Cai T
    Child Abuse Negl; 2022 Feb; 124():105449. PubMed ID: 34922261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bio-behavioral scientific evidence alters judges' sentencing decision-making: A quantitative analysis.
    Thomaidou MA; Berryessa CM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024 Jul; 95():102007. PubMed ID: 38991330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Slippery scales: Cost prompts, but not benefit prompts, modulate sentencing recommendations in laypeople.
    Aharoni E; Kleider-Offutt HM; Brosnan SF; Fernandes S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236764. PubMed ID: 32735624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Playing dice with criminal sentences: the influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making.
    Englich B; Mussweiler T; Strack F
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Feb; 32(2):188-200. PubMed ID: 16382081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should victim impact influence sentences? Understanding the community's justice reasoning.
    Hills AM; Thomson DM
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(5):661-71. PubMed ID: 10723104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based sentencing: Public openness and opposition to using gender, age, and race as risk factors for recidivism.
    Scurich N; Monahan J
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Feb; 40(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 26390055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting sentencing for low-level crimes: comparing models of human judgment.
    von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):375-95. PubMed ID: 20025422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Public support for sentencing reform: A policy-capturing experiment.
    Vardsveen TC; Wiener RL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):430-446. PubMed ID: 33779195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The trial tax and the intersection of race/ethnicity, gender, and age in criminal court sentencing.
    Lehmann PS
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):201-216. PubMed ID: 36931858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prisoners with intellectual disabilities and detention status. Findings from a UK cross sectional study of prisons.
    Ali A; Ghosh S; Strydom A; Hassiotis A
    Res Dev Disabil; 2016; 53-54():189-97. PubMed ID: 26921526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.