These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20479212)

  • 21. The effect of retributive and restorative sentencing on psychological effects of criminal proceedings.
    Laxminarayan M
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Mar; 28(5):938-55. PubMed ID: 23079937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When domestic goes capital: Juror decision making in capital murder trials involving domestic homicide.
    Richards TN; Smith MD; Fogel SJ; Bjerregaard B
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 25844513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sentencing Policy, Social Values and Discretionary Justice.
    Henham R
    Oxf J Leg Stud; 2022; 42(4):1093-1117. PubMed ID: 36518974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Who is the victim anyway? The effects of bystander victim impact statements on mock juror sentencing decisions.
    McGowan MG; Myers B
    Violence Vict; 2004 Jun; 19(3):357-74. PubMed ID: 15631286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Justice at any cost? The impact of cost-benefit salience on criminal punishment judgments.
    Aharoni E; Kleider-Offutt HM; Brosnan SF; Watzek J
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):38-60. PubMed ID: 30474239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sentencing convicted juvenile felony offenders in the adult court: the direct effects of race.
    Howell RJ; Hutto TS
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(6):782-99. PubMed ID: 22592862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of offenders' age and health on sentencing decisions.
    Mueller-Johnson KU; Dhami MK
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(1):77-97. PubMed ID: 20196530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Crime and Punishment (Scotland) Act 1997: a survey of sentencers' views concerning the Scottish 'hybrid order'.
    Darjee R; Crichton J; Thomson L
    Med Sci Law; 2002 Jan; 42(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 11848143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment.
    Carlsmith KM; Darley JM; Robinson PH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Aug; 83(2):284-299. PubMed ID: 12150228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The guilty mind and criminal sentencing: integrating legal and empirical inquiry as illustrated by capital sentencing.
    Schopp RF; Patry MW
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(5):631-51. PubMed ID: 14502693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Death Penalty Disposition in China: What Matters?
    Li Y; Longmire D; Lu H
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Jan; 62(1):253-273. PubMed ID: 27056789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Punishing repeat offenders in the Netherlands: balancing between incapacitation and treatment.
    Struijk S
    Behav Sci Law; 2015 Feb; 33(1):148-66. PubMed ID: 25693957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of Afrocentric facial features in criminal sentencing.
    Blair IV; Judd CM; Chapleau KM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Oct; 15(10):674-9. PubMed ID: 15447638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Older men and older women in the arms of criminal law: offending patterns and sentencing outcomes.
    Steffensmeier D; Motivans M
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2000 May; 55(3):S141-51. PubMed ID: 11833982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Imprisonment for non-intentional transmission of HIV: can it be supported using established principles for justifying criminal sentencing?
    Phillips M; Sukthankar A
    Sex Transm Infect; 2013 Jun; 89(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 23580609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Risk and resources: A qualitative perspective on low-level sentencing in Virginia.
    Metz A; Monahan J; Garrett B; Siebert L
    J Community Psychol; 2019 Jul; 47(6):1476-1492. PubMed ID: 31090080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reactions to youth crime: perceptions of accountability and competency.
    Ghetti S; Redlich AD
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(1):33-52. PubMed ID: 11241680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Comparative aspects of penal sanctions].
    McKay RB
    Quad Criminol Clin; 1976; 18(3):371-84. PubMed ID: 1019285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diversion of Mentally Ill Offenders from the Criminal Justice System in Ireland: Comparison with England and Wales.
    Gulati G; Kelly BD
    Ir Med J; 2018 Mar; 111(3):719. PubMed ID: 30376236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating science outside the trial box: applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines' criminal history score.
    Krauss DA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006; 29(4):289-305. PubMed ID: 16530267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.