These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20479696)

  • 1. Exploring the recruitment, ethical considerations, conduct and information dissemination of an audiology trial: a pretrial qualitative study (q-COACH).
    Francis-Auton E; Warren C; Braithwaite J; Rapport F
    Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):28. PubMed ID: 31907073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A systematic review of studies measuring and reporting hearing aid usage in older adults since 1999: a descriptive summary of measurement tools.
    Perez E; Edmonds BA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e31831. PubMed ID: 22479312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carina® and Esteem®: a systematic review of fully implantable hearing devices.
    Pulcherio JO; Bittencourt AG; Burke PR; Monsanto RC; de Brito R; Tsuji RK; Bento RF
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110636. PubMed ID: 25329463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is Age a Limiting Factor for Audiological Results in Active Middle Ear Implants?
    Morales-Puebla JM; Lassaletta L; Sánchez-Cuadrado I; Calvino M; Gavilán J
    J Pers Med; 2023 Nov; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 38138877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimal Reporting Standards for Active Middle Ear Hearing Implants.
    Maier H; Baumann U; Baumgartner WD; Beutner D; Caversaccio MD; Keintzel T; Kompis M; Lenarz T; Magele A; Mewes T; Müller A; Rader T; Rahne T; Schraven SP; Schwab B; Sprinzl GM; Strauchmann B; Todt I; Wesarg T; Wollenberg B; Plontke SK
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(2):105-115. PubMed ID: 30196279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the effectiveness and reliability of the Vibrant Soundbridge and Bonebridge auditory implants in clinical practice: Study design and methods for a multi-centre longitudinal observational study.
    Vickers D; Canas A; Degun A; Briggs J; Bingham M; Toner J; Cooper H; Rogers S; Cooper S; Irving R; Spielman P; Batty S; Jones S; Asher A; Chung M; Donnelly N; Skibinska A; Gardner R; Raine C; Andrew R; Green K; Ghulam H; Nunn T; Jiang D; Fürhapter S; Urban M; Hanvey K; Flynn S; Lovegrove D; Saeed S
    Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2018 Jun; 10():137-140. PubMed ID: 30023447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetomotive Displacement of the Tympanic Membrane Using Magnetic Nanoparticles: Toward Enhancement of Sound Perception.
    Huang PC; Chaney EJ; Shelton RL; Boppart SA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Dec; 65(12):2837-2846. PubMed ID: 29993404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with benefit of active middle ear implants compared to conventional hearing aids.
    McRackan TR; Clinkscales WB; Ahlstrom JB; Nguyen SA; Dubno JR
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Sep; 128(9):2133-2138. PubMed ID: 29481695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developing an Ear Prosthesis Fabricated in Polyvinylidene Fluoride by a 3D Printer with Sensory Intrinsic Properties of Pressure and Temperature.
    Suaste-Gómez E; Rodríguez-Roldán G; Reyes-Cruz H; Terán-Jiménez O
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Mar; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 26959026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Case of Incus Vibroplasty: Postoperative Changes in Residual Hearing.
    Roh KJ; Lee EJ; Choi BI; Son EJ
    J Audiol Otol; 2015 Apr; 19(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 26185793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Differential indication of active middle ear implants].
    Braun K; Zenner HP; Friese N; Tropitzsch A
    HNO; 2015 Jun; 63(6):402-18. PubMed ID: 26054730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term functional outcome and satisfaction of patients with an active middle ear implant for sensorineural hearing loss compared to a matched population with conventional hearing aids.
    Ihler F; Bewarder J; Blum J; Matthias C; Canis M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 271(12):3161-9. PubMed ID: 24248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Esteem® middle ear device versus conventional hearing aids for rehabilitation of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Monini S; Biagini M; Atturo F; Barbara M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 270(7):2027-33. PubMed ID: 23143506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Implantable hearing aids].
    Luers JC; Beutner D; Hüttenbrink KB
    HNO; 2011 Oct; 59(10):980-7. PubMed ID: 21956678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic review of middle ear implants: do they improve hearing as much as conventional hearing AIDS?
    Tysome JR; Moorthy R; Lee A; Jiang D; O'Connor AF
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Dec; 31(9):1369-75. PubMed ID: 20479696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic hearing implants for mixed hearing loss: a systematic review.
    Verhaert N; Desloovere C; Wouters J
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1201-9. PubMed ID: 23921919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Middle ear implants for rehabilitation of sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review of FDA approved devices.
    Kahue CN; Carlson ML; Daugherty JA; Haynes DS; Glasscock ME
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Aug; 35(7):1228-37. PubMed ID: 24643033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of the active middle-ear implant in patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Butler CL; Thavaneswaran P; Lee IH
    J Laryngol Otol; 2013 Jul; 127 Suppl 2():S8-16. PubMed ID: 23790515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.