These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20480695)

  • 1. Team learning and effectiveness in virtual project teams: the role of beliefs about interpersonal context.
    Ortega A; Sánchez-Manzanares M; Gil F; Rico R
    Span J Psychol; 2010 May; 13(1):267-76. PubMed ID: 20480695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancing team learning in nursing teams through beliefs about interpersonal context.
    Ortega A; Sánchez-Manzanares M; Gil F; Rico R
    J Adv Nurs; 2013 Jan; 69(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 22469361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A virtual team group process.
    Bell M; Robertson D; Weeks M; Yu D
    Can J Nurs Leadersh; 2002; 15(3):30-3. PubMed ID: 12395975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The role of self-guided training in the relationship between task conflict and innovation in virtual teams].
    Martínez Moreno E; Orengo Castellá V; Zornoza Abad A
    Psicothema; 2012 Feb; 24(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 22269360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What makes learning and understanding in virtual teams so difficult?
    Häkkinen P
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2004 Apr; 7(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 15140363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: a motivated information processing perspective.
    De Dreu CK
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):628-38. PubMed ID: 17484546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overcoming asymmetric goals in teams: the interactive roles of team learning orientation and team identification.
    Pearsall MJ; Venkataramani V
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 May; 100(3):735-48. PubMed ID: 25384202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristics of work groups and their relationship with social and task cohesion in student teams.
    Forrester WR; Tashchian A
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Aug; 95(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 15460377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How can leaders foster team learning? Effects of leader-assigned mastery and performance goals and psychological safety.
    Ashauer SA; Macan T
    J Psychol; 2013; 147(6):541-61. PubMed ID: 24199511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning and understanding in virtual teams.
    Kirschner PA; Van Bruggen J
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2004 Apr; 7(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 15140357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In search of reflective behavior and shared understanding in ad hoc expert teams.
    Mulder I; Swaak J; Kessels J
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2004 Apr; 7(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 15140358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness in top management group meetings: the role of goal clarity, focused communication, and learning behavior.
    Bang H; Fuglesang SL; Ovesen MR; Eilertsen DE
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Jun; 51(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 20132458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interteam Cooperation and Competition and Boundary Activities: The Cross-Level Mediation of Team Goal Orientations.
    Shin Y; Kim M; Hur WM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jul; 16(15):. PubMed ID: 31370325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceived shared understanding in teams: The motivational effect of being 'on the same page'.
    Aubé C; Rousseau V; Tremblay S
    Br J Psychol; 2015 Aug; 106(3):468-86. PubMed ID: 25278276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Team negotiation: social, epistemic, economic, and psychological consequences of subgroup conflict.
    Halevy N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1687-702. PubMed ID: 18832517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structural interdependence in teams: An integrative framework and meta-analysis.
    Courtright SH; Thurgood GR; Stewart GL; Pierotti AJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Nov; 100(6):1825-46. PubMed ID: 25938722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Boundary work in knowledge teams.
    Faraj S; Yan A
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 May; 94(3):604-17. PubMed ID: 19450002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators.
    Breuer C; Hüffmeier J; Hertel G
    J Appl Psychol; 2016 Aug; 101(8):1151-77. PubMed ID: 27228105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Transactive memory in decision-making teams: implications for team effectiveness].
    Sánchez-Manzanares M; Rico R; Gil F; San Martín R
    Psicothema; 2006 Nov; 18(4):750-6. PubMed ID: 17296113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Harming high performers: a social comparison perspective on interpersonal harming in work teams.
    Lam CK; Van der Vegt GS; Walter F; Huang X
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 May; 96(3):588-601. PubMed ID: 21171734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.