These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20480850)

  • 21. Study on emission of hazardous trace elements in a 350 MW coal-fired power plant. Part 2. arsenic, chromium, barium, manganese, lead.
    Zhao S; Duan Y; Chen L; Li Y; Yao T; Liu S; Liu M; Lu J
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Jul; 226():404-411. PubMed ID: 28416223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Enhancement of mercury capture by the simultaneous addition of hydrogen bromide (HBr) and fly ashes in a slipstream facility.
    Cao Y; Wang QH; Li J; Cheng JC; Chan CC; Cohron M; Pan WP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Apr; 43(8):2812-7. PubMed ID: 19475955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distribution and Fate of Mercury in Pulverized Bituminous Coal-Fired Power Plants in Coal Energy-Dominant Huainan City, China.
    Chen B; Liu G; Sun R
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2016 May; 70(4):724-33. PubMed ID: 26883032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mercury mass balances: a case study of two North Dakota power plants.
    Laudal DL; Pavlish JH; Graves J; Stockdill D
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Oct; 50(10):1798-804. PubMed ID: 11288308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Selenium Partitioning and Removal Across a Wet FGD Scrubber at a Coal-Fired Power Plant.
    Senior CL; Tyree CA; Meeks ND; Acharya C; McCain JD; Cushing KM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14376-82. PubMed ID: 26554426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mobility and contamination assessment of mercury in coal fly ash, atmospheric deposition, and soil collected from Tianjin, China.
    Wei Z; Wu G; Su R; Li C; Liang P
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Sep; 30(9):1997-2003. PubMed ID: 21713969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Characterization of arsenic emissions from a coal-fired power plant].
    Guo X; Zheng CG; Cheng D
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2006 Apr; 27(4):631-4. PubMed ID: 16767977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Elemental mercury oxidation in an electrostatic precipitator enhanced with in situ soft X-ray irradiation.
    Jing H; Wang X; Wang WN; Biswas P
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Apr; 65(4):455-65. PubMed ID: 25947215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Behavior of thallium in pulverized coal utility boiler installations in Southwest China.
    Li Z; Zhou X; Wang Q; Li X; Zhang L; Wang D; He T; Cao Y; Feng X
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 Apr; 71(4):488-500. PubMed ID: 33216702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mercury emissions from a coal-fired power plant in Japan.
    Yokoyama T; Asakura K; Matsuda H; Ito S; Noda N
    Sci Total Environ; 2000 Oct; 259(1-3):97-103. PubMed ID: 11032139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Arsenic emission and distribution characteristics in the ultra-low emission coal-fired power plant.
    Han L; Zhao Y; Hao R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(24):36814-36823. PubMed ID: 35064494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mercury emissions and partitioning from Indian coal-fired power plants.
    Agarwalla H; Senapati RN; Das TB
    J Environ Sci (China); 2021 Feb; 100():28-33. PubMed ID: 33279041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Distribution and emission characteristics of filterable and condensable particulate matter before and after a low-low temperature electrostatic precipitator.
    Li X; Zhou C; Li J; Lu S; Yan J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 May; 26(13):12798-12806. PubMed ID: 30887449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mercury in coal ash and its fate in the Indian subcontinent: A synoptic review.
    Mukherjee AB; Zevenhoven R
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Sep; 368(1):384-92. PubMed ID: 16183102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurement of mercury in flue gas based on an aluminum matrix sorbent.
    Wang J; Xu W; Wang X; Wang W
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2011; 11():2469-79. PubMed ID: 22235178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A pilot study of mercury liberation and capture from coal-fired power plant fly ash.
    Li J; Gao X; Goeckner B; Kollakowsky D; Ramme B
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Mar; 55(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 15828667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The secondary release of mercury in coal fly ash-based flue-gas mercury removal technology.
    He J; Duan C; Lei M; Zhu X
    Environ Technol; 2016; 37(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 26121324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Active methods of mercury removal from flue gases.
    Marczak M; Budzyń S; Szczurowski J; Kogut K; Burmistrz P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(9):8383-8392. PubMed ID: 29572741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Denitrification devices in urban boilers change mercury isotope fractionation signatures of coal combustion products.
    Yuan J; Sun R; Wang R; Fu B; Meng M; Zheng W; Chen J
    Environ Pollut; 2021 Jan; 268(Pt B):115753. PubMed ID: 33045583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new method to assess mercury emissions: a study of three coal-fired electric-generating power station configurations.
    Boylan HM; Cain RD; Kingston HM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Nov; 53(11):1318-25. PubMed ID: 14649751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.