These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20481198)

  • 1. Electronic medical record and quality of patient care in the VA.
    Ali T
    Med Health R I; 2010 Jan; 93(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 20481198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study.
    Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The electronic medical record: learning to swim.
    Abelson TI
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2010 Jul; 77(7):415-9. PubMed ID: 20601614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Rhode Island survey of physician EMR adoption.
    Buechner JS; Baier RR; Gifford DR
    Med Health R I; 2008 Feb; 91(2):64. PubMed ID: 18372864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The electronic medical record: diving into a shallow pool?
    Hanlon JT
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2010 Jul; 77(7):408-11. PubMed ID: 20601613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the accuracy of computerized medication histories.
    Kaboli PJ; McClimon BJ; Hoth AB; Barnett MJ
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 2):872-7. PubMed ID: 15609741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. VA health services research: lessons for the world's healthcare organizations.
    Bernstein SJ
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 2):825-7. PubMed ID: 15609735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating changes in end-user satisfaction with installation of an electronic medical record in ambulatory care settings.
    Gamm LD; Barsukiewicz CK; Dansky KH; Vasey JJ
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 1998; 12(4):53-65. PubMed ID: 10345834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nurses' views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: questionnaire development.
    Otieno OG; Toyama H; Asonuma M; Kanai-Pak M; Naitoh K
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 17877568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computerized patient records aren't much good if doctors don't use them. Here's how one hospital got its physicians online.
    Strateg Healthc Excell; 1998 Jul; 11(7):7-10. PubMed ID: 10185070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How documentation outcomes guide the way: a patient health education electronic medical record experience in a large health care network.
    Leisner BA; Wonch DE
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2006; 15(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 16849989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nurses' experiences of and opinions about using standardised care plans in electronic health records--a questionnaire study.
    Dahm MF; Wadensten B
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2137-45. PubMed ID: 18705735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementation of an electronic documentation system using microsystem and quality improvement concepts.
    Rikli J; Huizinga B; Schafer D; Atwater A; Coker K; Sikora C
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Apr; 9(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 19363324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality improvement initiatives improve hypertension care among veterans.
    Choma NN; Huang RL; Dittus RS; Burnham KE; Roumie CL
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2009 Jul; 2(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 20031866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Veterans Health Administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care.
    Perlin JB; Kolodner RM; Roswell RH
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 2):828-36. PubMed ID: 15609736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electronic medical record improves patient care, saves $10 million a year.
    Perform Improv Advis; 2004 Nov; 8(11):125-7, 121. PubMed ID: 15645783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The electronic medical record: a work in progress.
    Lukasik G
    J Healthc Resour Manag; 1996 Dec; 14(10):14, 16-7, 20. PubMed ID: 10163202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differing faculty and housestaff acceptance of an electronic health record one year after implementation.
    Hier DB; Rothschild A; LeMaistre A; Keeler J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15361024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A patient-controlled journal for an electronic medical record: issues and challenges.
    Wald JS; Middleton B; Bloom A; Walmsley D; Gleason M; Nelson E; Li Q; Epstein M; Volk L; Bates DW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1166-70. PubMed ID: 15360996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of computerized outpatient diagnoses in a Veterans Affairs general medicine clinic.
    Szeto HC; Coleman RK; Gholami P; Hoffman BB; Goldstein MK
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 Jan; 8(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 11814171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.