These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20482352)

  • 1. Reliability of reference distances used in photogrammetry.
    Aksu M; Kaya D; Kocadereli I
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jul; 80(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 20482352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frontal facial proportions of 12-year-old southern Chinese: a photogrammetric study.
    Yeung CY; McGrath CP; Wong RW; Hägg EU; Lo J; Yang Y
    Head Face Med; 2015 Aug; 11():26. PubMed ID: 26271276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Face Anthropometry and Digital 2D-Face Photogrammetry as Methods for Predicting Vertical Dimension of Occlusion.
    Strajnić L; Perić M; Živković N; Lemić AM; Vučinić N; Miličić B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; (3):282-292. PubMed ID: 37824121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.
    Dindaroğlu F; Kutlu P; Duran GS; Görgülü S; Aslan E
    Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 26267357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards a method for determining age ranges from faces of juveniles on photographs.
    Cummaudo M; Guerzoni M; Gibelli D; Cigada A; Obertovà Z; Ratnayake M; Poppa P; Gabriel P; Ritz-Timme S; Cattaneo C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jun; 239():107.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24726662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Anatolian Turkish adults.
    Kale-Varlk S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1481-6. PubMed ID: 19098536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is photogrammetry of the face reliable?
    Farkas LG; Bryson W; Klotz J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1980 Sep; 66(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 7422721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The anthropomorphic proportions of the face: an evaluation of the response to orthodontic surgical treatment of Angle class III].
    Savastano C; Craca R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1992 Sep; 41(9):373-83. PubMed ID: 1491654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Craniofacial anthropometric norms of Malays.
    Ngeow WC; Aljunid ST
    Singapore Med J; 2009 May; 50(5):525-8. PubMed ID: 19495526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A computer assisted photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment. Part I: Methodology and reliability.
    Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jorgensen GJ; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jun; 107(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 7771369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images.
    Wong JY; Oh AK; Ohta E; Hunt AT; Rogers GF; Mulliken JB; Deutsch CK
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2008 May; 45(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 18452351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Photogrammetric Correlation of Face with Frontal Radiographs and Direct Measurements.
    Negi G; Ponnada S; Aravind NKS; Chitra P
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 May; 11(5):ZC79-ZC83. PubMed ID: 28658914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lateral facial profile may reveal the risk for sleep disordered breathing in children--the PANIC-study.
    Ikävalko T; Närhi M; Lakka T; Myllykangas R; Tuomilehto H; Vierola A; Pahkala R
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015; 73(7):550-5. PubMed ID: 25892581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue profile in 12-year-old southern Chinese.
    Leung CS; Yang Y; Wong RW; Hägg U; Lo J; McGrath C
    Head Face Med; 2014 Dec; 10():56. PubMed ID: 25540054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Correlation between sagittal photogrammetric measurements of the soft tissue profile and dental arches measurements].
    Diouf JS; Touré B; Ndiaye M; Badiane A; Diop-Bâ K; Ngom PI; Diagne F
    Orthod Fr; 2015 Dec; 86(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 26655417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of anthropometry with photogrammetry based on a standardized clinical photographic technique using a cephalostat and chair.
    Han K; Kwon HJ; Choi TH; Kim JH; Son D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):96-107. PubMed ID: 19482483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Craniofacial Anthropometry of Healthy Turkish Young Adults: Outer Canthal, Inner Canthal, Palpebral Fissure, and Interpupillary Distances.
    Bahşi I; Orhan M; Kervancioğlu P; Karatepe Ş; Sayn S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 32(5):1906-1909. PubMed ID: 33208700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.
    Fortes HN; Guimarães TC; Belo IM; da Matta EN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 24945516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft-tissue facial profile of Indian adults.
    Pandian KS; Krishnan S; Kumar SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 29652003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.