204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20482354)
1. Accuracy and reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models.
Choi DS; Jeong YM; Jang I; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Cha BK
Angle Orthod; 2010 Jul; 80(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 20482354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new perspective on the relationship between anchorage and palatal morphology: Three-dimensional digital model analysis.
Metin-Gursoy G; Tortop T
Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Oct; 25(10):1666-1673. PubMed ID: 36308237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel method for the assessment of three-dimensional tooth movement during orthodontic treatment.
Jang I; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Iijima S; Yozgatian JH; Cha BK; Yoshida N
Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 19413387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between 2D cephalometric and 3D digital model superimpositions in patients with lateral incisor agenesis treated by canine substitution.
Hage L; Kmeid R; Amm E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Jan; 165(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 37737803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deviations in palatal region between indirect and direct digital models: an in vivo study.
Zhongpeng Y; Tianmin X; Ruoping J
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 31029133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology.
Cha BK; Lee JY; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Yoshida N
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 17513876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stable region for maxillary dental cast superimposition in adults, studied with the aid of stable miniscrews.
Chen G; Chen S; Zhang XY; Jiang RP; Liu Y; Shi FH; Xu TM
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 May; 14(2):70-9. PubMed ID: 21457456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional palatal superimposition of digital dental models.
Talaat S; Kaboudan A; Bourauel C; Ragy N; Kula K; Ghoneima A
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):365-370. PubMed ID: 28339627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Palatal rugae positional changes during orthodontic treatment of growing patients.
Pazera C; Gkantidis N
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Aug; 24(3):351-359. PubMed ID: 33200559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of palatal superimposition of 3-dimensional digital models in cases treated with rapid maxillary expansion and maxillary protraction headgear.
Choi JI; Cha BK; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Choi DS; Jang IS
Korean J Orthod; 2012 Oct; 42(5):235-41. PubMed ID: 23173116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of regular dental cast artifacts on the 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental models.
Henninger E; Vasilakos G; Halazonetis D; Gkantidis N
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10501. PubMed ID: 31324833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring 3-dimensional tooth movement with a 3-dimensional surface laser scanner.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Al-Abdallah M; Akram NC; Sandler J; O'Brien K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 19361734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel method for superimposition and measurements on maxillary digital 3D models-studies on validity and reliability.
Ganzer N; Feldmann I; Liv P; Bondemark L
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28444179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of palatal support tissues for placement of orthodontic mini-implants in mouth breathers with high-narrow palates versus nose breathers with normal palates: a retrospective study.
Kang Q; Cha C; Huang D; Zuo S; Yan X
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1259-1267. PubMed ID: 31302770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are there differences between comparison methods used to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of digital models?
Camardella LT; Breuning H; Vilella OV
Dental Press J Orthod; 2017 Feb; 22(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 28444012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Superimposition of virtual models using palatal rugae and maximum habitual intercuspation.
Holz IS; Carvalho FAR; Almeida RCC
Dental Press J Orthod; 2024; 29(2):e24spe2. PubMed ID: 38775602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of a stable reference area for superimposing mandibular digital models.
An K; Jang I; Choi DS; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Cha BK
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Nov; 76(6):508-19. PubMed ID: 26250456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and reliability of maxillary digital model (MDM) superimposition in evaluating teeth movement in adults compared with CBCT maxillary superimposition.
Pan Y; Wang X; Dai F; Chen G; Xu T
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19384. PubMed ID: 33168909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
