64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20482719)
1. The use of digital images to evaluate the interobserver agreement on cervical smear readings in Italian cervical cancer screening.
Tinacci G; Biggeri A; Pellegrini A; Cariaggi MP; Schiboni ML; Confortini M
Cytopathology; 2011 Apr; 22(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 20482719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interlaboratory reproducibility of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: a national survey.
Confortini M; Di Bonito L; Carozzi F; Ghiringhello B; Montanari G; Parisio F; Prandi S;
Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):353-60. PubMed ID: 17168918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Daily peer review of abnormal cervical smears in the assessment of individual practice as an additional method of internal quality control.
Confortini M; Di Stefano C; Biggeri A; Bulgaresi P; Di Claudio G; Grisotto L; Maddau C; Matucci M; Petreschi C; Troni GM; Turco P; Foxi P
Cytopathology; 2016 Feb; 27(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 25123613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility of telecytology diagnosis of cervical smears in a quality assurance program: the Georgian experience.
Kldiashvili E; Schrader T
Telemed J E Health; 2011 Sep; 17(7):565-8. PubMed ID: 21851161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Bethesda Interobserver Reproducibility Study (BIRST): a web-based assessment of the Bethesda 2001 System for classifying cervical cytology.
Sherman ME; Dasgupta A; Schiffman M; Nayar R; Solomon D
Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 17186503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comment on diagnosis of atypical squamous cells using new the Bethesda system 2001].
Wang Y; Bian ML; Liu J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Jan; 39(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 14989984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin.
Simsir A; Hwang S; Cangiarella J; Elgert P; Levine P; Sheffield MV; Roberson J; Talley L; Chhieng DC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 14681938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver variability in cytologic subclassification of squamous intraepithelial lesions--the Bethesda System vs. World Health Organization classification.
Pajtler M; Audy-Jurković S; Milicić-Juhas V; Staklenac B; Pauzar B
Coll Antropol; 2006 Mar; 30(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 16617588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of specimen adequacy reproducibility: an Italian experience.
Montanari G; Confortini M; Bellomi A; Cocchi V; Dalla Palma P; D'Ambrosio E; Giovagnoli MR; Navone R; Ronco G;
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):224-6. PubMed ID: 12672101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevaccination distribution of human papillomavirus types in women attending at cervical cancer screening in Belgium.
Arbyn M; Benoy I; Simoens C; Bogers J; Beutels P; Depuydt C
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Jan; 18(1):321-30. PubMed ID: 19124515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
Sherman ME; Kelly D
Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Applicative aspects of liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer screening].
Liverani M; De Paola F; Danesi S; Fedriga R; Dalbuoni V; Agnoletti R; Amadori AR; Mirra F; Bonoli W; Saragoni L
Pathologica; 2006 Dec; 98(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 17285839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Bethesda System. A proposal for reporting abnormal cervical smears based on the reproducibility of cytopathologic diagnoses.
Sherman ME; Schiffman MH; Erozan YS; Wacholder S; Kurman RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Nov; 116(11):1155-8. PubMed ID: 1444745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of static telecytological diagnoses' reproducibility in cervical smears prepared by means of liquid-based cytology.
Tsilalis T; Archondakis S; Meristoudis C; Margari N; Pouliakis A; Skagias L; Panayiotides I; Karakitsos P
Telemed J E Health; 2012 Sep; 18(7):516-20. PubMed ID: 22856666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bethesda Interobserver Reproducibility Study-2 (BIRST-2): Bethesda System 2014.
Kurtycz DFI; Staats PN; Chute DJ; Russell D; Pavelec D; Monaco SE; Friedlander MA; Wilbur DC; Nayar R
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2017; 6(4):131-144. PubMed ID: 31043266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
