These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20482719)

  • 21. Atypical Glandular Cells: Interobserver Variability according to Clinical Management.
    Lepe M; Eklund CM; Quddus MR; Paquette C
    Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(5-6):397-404. PubMed ID: 29969775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy and reproducibility of telecytology diagnosis of cervical smears. A tool for quality assurance programs.
    Lee ES; Kim IS; Choi JS; Yeom BW; Kim HK; Han JH; Lee MS; Leong AS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Mar; 119(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 12645336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology.
    Evered A; Dudding N
    Cytopathology; 2011 Apr; 22(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 20482714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of digital image manipulation in cytology.
    Pinco J; Goulart RA; Otis CN; Garb J; Pantanowitz L
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Jan; 133(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 19123737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Digital images for interobserver variability comparison in cervicovaginal cytology.
    Tinacci G; Cariaggi MP; Carozzi F; Foggi A; Miccinesi G; Mirri F; Pasquini P; Zappa M; Confortini M
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2003 Feb; 25(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 12630075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Use of Static Telecytology for Quality Assessment Purposes in the Evaluation of Cervical Smears Prepared by Means of Liquid-Based Cytology.
    Archondakis S; Roma M; Kaladelfou E
    Telemed J E Health; 2020 Dec; 26(12):1522-1525. PubMed ID: 32167860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Variation in the assessment of adequacy in cervical smears.
    Migliore G; Rossi E; Aldovini A; Mudu P; Alderisio M; Giovagnoli MR; Fabiano A; Morosini PL; Branca M
    Cytopathology; 2001 Dec; 12(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 11843939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interlaboratory reproducibility in reporting inadequate cervical smears--a multicentre multinational study.
    Ciatto S; Cariaggi MP; Minuti AP; Confortini M; Palli D; Pas L; McKee G; Schenck U; Bonaccorsi A; Corradi G; Olivati S; Pieri L; Carretti D; Cocchi V
    Cytopathology; 1996 Dec; 7(6):386-90. PubMed ID: 8958471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Expert consultation for cervical carcinoma smears. Reliability of selected-field videomicroscopy.
    Ziol M; Vacher-Lavenu MC; Heudes D; Ferrand J; Mayelo V; Molinié V; Slama S; Marsan C
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1999 Feb; 21(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 10068773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A quality control system involving peer review of abnormal cervical smears.
    Palli D; Confortini M; Biggeri A; Russo A; Cariaggi P; Carozzi F; Minuti PA
    Cytopathology; 1993; 4(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 8453014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interobserver variability in assessing adequacy of the squamous component in conventional cervicovaginal smears.
    Sheffield MV; Simsir A; Talley L; Roberson AJ; Elgert PA; Chhieng DC
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Mar; 119(3):367-73. PubMed ID: 12645338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cervical smear adequacy: cellularity references were found to increase both interobserver agreement and unsatisfactory rate.
    Moore D; Pugh-Cain D; Walker T
    Cytopathology; 2009 Jun; 20(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 18713249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of circulation and discussion of cervical smears on agreement between laboratories.
    Ronco G; Montanari G; Confortini M; Parisio F; Berardengo E; Delpiano AM; Arnaud S; Campione D; Baldini D; Poll P; Lynge E; Mancini E; Segnan N
    Cytopathology; 2003 Jun; 14(3):115-20. PubMed ID: 12828719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. External quality assurance in cervical/vaginal cytology: Interlaboratory agreement in the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy.
    Cocchi V; Sintoni C; Carretti D; Sama D; Chiari U; Segala V; Delazer AL; Grilli N; Papaleo R; Ghirardini C; Bucchi L
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):480-8. PubMed ID: 8669183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interlaboratory quality control in gynecologic cytopathology using the novel CONQUISTADOR software. Interobserver reproducibility in the Latin American screening study.
    Alderisio M; Branca M; Erzen M; Longatto-Filho A; Derchain S; Tatti S; Vighi S; Roteli-Martins C; Leoncini L; Maeda MY; Montis D; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Syrjänen K
    Acta Cytol; 2007; 51(6):872-81. PubMed ID: 18077979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [External quality control for cervical cytology exams performed in the Brazilian Public Health System of Mato Grosso do Sul State].
    de Freitas HG; Thuler LC
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2012 Aug; 34(8):351-6. PubMed ID: 23080277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of Laboratories after 10 Years of Participating in External Quality Monitoring in Cervical Cytology.
    de Morais LSF; Magalhães JC; Braga IDS; Marega LA; Tavares SBDN; Amaral RG
    Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 31480038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital Applications in Cytopathology: Problems, Rationalizations, and Alternative Approaches.
    Chantziantoniou N; Mukherjee M; Donnelly AD; Pantanowitz L; Austin RM
    Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 29183021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproducibility of cervicovaginal ThinPrep cellularity assessment.
    Haroon S; Samayoa L; Witzke D; Davey D
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jan; 26(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 11782081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dual-path network with synergistic grouping loss and evidence driven risk stratification for whole slide cervical image analysis.
    Lin H; Chen H; Wang X; Wang Q; Wang L; Heng PA
    Med Image Anal; 2021 Apr; 69():101955. PubMed ID: 33588122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.