172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20482902)
1. [The quality indicator 'tumour positive surgical margin following breast-conserving surgery' does not provide transparent insight into care].
Gooiker GA; Veerbeek L; van der Geest LG; Stijnen T; Dekker JW; Nortier JW; Marinelli AW; Struikmans H; Wouters MW; Tollenaar RA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A1142. PubMed ID: 20482902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors for local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery.
Fredriksson I; Liljegren G; Palm-Sjövall M; Arnesson LG; Emdin SO; Fornander T; Lindgren A; Nordgren H; Idvall I; Holmqvist M; Holmberg L; Frisell J
Br J Surg; 2003 Sep; 90(9):1093-102. PubMed ID: 12945077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variation between hospitals in surgical margins after first breast-conserving surgery in the Netherlands.
van der Heiden-van der Loo M; de Munck L; Visser O; Westenend PJ; van Dalen T; Menke MB; Rutgers EJ; Peeters PH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jan; 131(2):691-8. PubMed ID: 21987038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Second operation more frequent following breast-conserving treatment for invasive lobular than for invasive non-lobular carcinoma].
de Zeeuw S; Wildenberg F; Strobbe L; Wobbes T
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A56. PubMed ID: 19900317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of lobular carcinoma in situ in association with invasive breast cancer on the rate of local recurrence in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Jolly S; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Vicini FA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Oct; 66(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 16965988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical margin and breast recurrence after breast-conserving therapy.
Horiguchi J; Iino Y; Takei H; Maemura M; Yokoe T; Niibe H; Yamakawa M; Nakajima T; Oyama T; Morishita Y
Oncol Rep; 1999; 6(1):135-8. PubMed ID: 9864416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer.
Keskek M; Kothari M; Ardehali B; Betambeau N; Nasiri N; Gui GP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 30(10):1058-64. PubMed ID: 15522551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Percentage of local recurrence following treatment for breast cancer is not a suitable performance indicator].
van der Heiden-van der Loo M; Ho VK; Damhuis RA; Siesling S; Menke MB; Peeters PH; Rutgers EJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A1984. PubMed ID: 20699029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Trends and variation in breast conserving surgery in the southeast and east of the Netherlands over the period 1990-2002].
Siesling S; van de Poll-Franse LV; Jobsen JJ; Repelaer van Driel OJ; Voogd AC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Aug; 149(35):1941-6. PubMed ID: 16159034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Local control in 118 consecutive high-risk breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Vordermark D; Lackenbauer A; Wulf J; Guckenberger M; Flentje M
Oncol Rep; 2007 Nov; 18(5):1335-9. PubMed ID: 17914594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Margin status and the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving treatment of lobular breast cancer.
van den Broek N; van der Sangen MJ; van de Poll-Franse LV; van Beek MW; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Voogd AC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 17115109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Residual disease after re-excision for tumour-positive surgical margins in both ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma of the breast: The effect of time.
Schouten van der Velden AP; Van de Vrande SL; Boetes C; Bult P; Wobbes T
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 96(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 17680635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Secondary breast operations are often necessary and are no indication of poor oncological quality].
Wobbes T; Schlooz-Vries MS
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(37):2005-6. PubMed ID: 18825886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CIH-Tokyo experience with breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy: 6.5 year follow-up results of 1462 patients.
Kasumi F; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Iijima K; Miyagi U; Tada K; Makita M; Iwase T; Oguchi M; Yamashita T; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G
Breast J; 2006; 12(5 Suppl 2):S181-90. PubMed ID: 16958999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does intraductal breast cancer spread in a segmental distribution? An analysis of residual tumour burden following segmental mastectomy using tumour bed biopsies.
Jenkinson AD; Al-Mufti RA; Mohsen Y; Berry MJ; Wells C; Carpenter R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2001 Feb; 27(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11237487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality measures for breast cancer surgery: initial validation of feasibility and assessment of variation among surgeons.
McCahill LE; Privette A; James T; Sheehey-Jones J; Ratliff J; Majercik D; Krag DN; Stanley M; Harlow S
Arch Surg; 2009 May; 144(5):455-62; discussion 462-3. PubMed ID: 19451489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
