These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20483160)

  • 1. Soil quality assessment under emerging regulatory requirements.
    Bone J; Head M; Barraclough D; Archer M; Scheib C; Flight D; Voulvoulis N
    Environ Int; 2010 Aug; 36(6):609-22. PubMed ID: 20483160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From chemical risk assessment to environmental quality management: the challenge for soil protection.
    Bone J; Head M; Jones DT; Barraclough D; Archer M; Scheib C; Flight D; Eggleton P; Voulvoulis N
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 20735057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of regulatory decisions for environmental protection: part I - challenges in the implementation of national soil policies.
    Rodrigues SM; Pereira ME; da Silva EF; Hursthouse AS; Duarte AC
    Environ Int; 2009 Jan; 35(1):202-13. PubMed ID: 18817974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined use of GIS and environmental indicators for assessment of chemical, physical and biological soil degradation in a Spanish Mediterranean region.
    de Paz JM; Sánchez J; Visconti F
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Apr; 79(2):150-62. PubMed ID: 16171939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A micro case study of the legal and administrative arrangements for river health in the Kangaroo River (NSW).
    Mooney C; Farrier D
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(11):161-8. PubMed ID: 12171348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legislation and ecological quality assessment of soil: implementation of ecological indication systems in Europe.
    Römbke J; Breure AM; Mulder C; Rutgers M
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Oct; 62(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 16112021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review of regulatory decisions for environmental protection: part II - the case-study of contaminated land management in Portugal.
    Rodrigues SM; Pereira ME; da Silva EF; Hursthouse AS; Duarte AC
    Environ Int; 2009 Jan; 35(1):214-25. PubMed ID: 18835040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating farm performance using agri-environmental indicators: recent experiences for nitrogen management in The Netherlands.
    Langeveld JW; Verhagen A; Neeteson JJ; van Keulen H; Conijn JG; Schils RL; Oenema J
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Feb; 82(3):363-76. PubMed ID: 17092629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soil quality in relation to soil pollution.
    de Haan FA
    Ciba Found Symp; 1993; 175():104-18; discussion 118-23. PubMed ID: 8222986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk-based ecological soil quality criteria for the characterization of contaminated soils. Combination of chemical and biological tools.
    Fernández MD; Vega MM; Tarazona JV
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Aug; 366(2-3):466-84. PubMed ID: 16574196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A conceptual framework: redefining forest soil's critical acid loads under a changing climate.
    McNulty SG; Boggs JL
    Environ Pollut; 2010 Jun; 158(6):2053-8. PubMed ID: 20045233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review and challenges of policies of environmental protection and sustainable development in China.
    Zhang KM; Wen ZG
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Sep; 88(4):1249-61. PubMed ID: 17767999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An integrated biomarker-based strategy for ecotoxicological evaluation of risk in environmental management.
    Moore MN; Depledge MH; Readman JW; Paul Leonard DR
    Mutat Res; 2004 Aug; 552(1-2):247-68. PubMed ID: 15288556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acid sulfate soils and human health--a Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
    Ljung K; Maley F; Cook A; Weinstein P
    Environ Int; 2009 Nov; 35(8):1234-42. PubMed ID: 19647876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Some thoughts of the comparison of risk based soil environmental standards between different countries].
    Zhang HZ; Luo YM; Xia JQ; Zhang HB
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2011 Mar; 32(3):795-802. PubMed ID: 21634180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Considerations for the use of soil ecological classification and assessment concepts in soil protection.
    Beck L; Römbke J; Breure AM; Mulder C
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Oct; 62(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 15919115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soil compaction--indicators for the assessment of harmful changes to the soil in the context of the German Federal Soil Protection Act.
    Lebert M; Böken H; Glante F
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Feb; 82(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 17129665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soil and soil environmental quality monitoring in China: a review.
    Teng Y; Wu J; Lu S; Wang Y; Jiao X; Song L
    Environ Int; 2014 Aug; 69():177-99. PubMed ID: 24875802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selected requirements on a sustainable nutrient management.
    Lampert C
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 12926631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental factors determining the trace-level sorption of silver and thallium to soils.
    Jacobson AR; McBride MB; Baveye P; Steenhuis TS
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Jun; 345(1-3):191-205. PubMed ID: 15919539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.