These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2048317)
1. Using the biased coin design for randomization in health care research. Hjelm-Karlsson K West J Nurs Res; 1991 Apr; 13(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 2048317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity in research. Roberts P; Priest H Nurs Stand; 2006 Jul 12-18; 20(44):41-5. PubMed ID: 16872117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Case study: design? Method? Or comprehensive strategy? Jones C; Lyons C Nurse Res; 2004; 11(3):70-6. PubMed ID: 15065485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Case-control design: an appropriate strategy for nursing research. Polivka BJ; Nickel JT Nurs Res; 1992; 41(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 1482502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding and critiquing quantitative research papers. Lee P Nurs Times; 2006 Jul 11-17; 102(28):28-30. PubMed ID: 16869219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exact optimum coin bias in Efron's randomization procedure. Antognini AB; Rosenberger WF; Wang Y; Zagoraiou M Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3760-8. PubMed ID: 26123177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of single-case experimental designs to evaluate nursing interventions for individual clients. La Grow S; Hamilton C Aust J Adv Nurs; 2000 Dec-2001 Feb; 18(2):39-43. PubMed ID: 11878499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The importance of pilot studies. van Teijlingen E; Hundley V Nurs Stand; 2002 Jun 19-25; 16(40):33-6. PubMed ID: 12216297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Literature reviews: evolution of a research methodology. Evans D; Kowanko I Aust J Adv Nurs; 2000 Dec-2001 Feb; 18(2):33-8. PubMed ID: 11878498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What future for research in mental health nursing: share the objective statistics! Parsons S J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 1998 Jun; 5(3):233-4. PubMed ID: 9807359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of action research. Karim K Nurs Stand; 2001 Mar 14-20; 15(26):33-5. PubMed ID: 12216236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The problem of under-powering in nursing research. King KM West J Nurs Res; 2001 Jun; 23(4):334-5. PubMed ID: 11383398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating quantitative research designs: Part 2. Haughey BP Crit Care Nurse; 1994 Dec; 14(6):69-72. PubMed ID: 7712803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating research: what it means to you. Maklebust J; Margolis DJ Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(4):4, 6. PubMed ID: 9306780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Are we satisfied with the way we review an article? Aslam M; Burris HH; Zupancic JA Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Feb; 9(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19212165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What future for research in mental health nursing: rejoinder to Parsons, Beech and Rolfe. Gournay K; Ritter S J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 1998 Jun; 5(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 9807357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]