These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20483827)

  • 1. Assessing the seeds of relationship decay. Using implicit evaluations to detect the early stages of disillusionment.
    Lee S; Rogge RD; Reis HT
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jun; 21(6):857-64. PubMed ID: 20483827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clarifying links between attachment and relationship quality: hostile conflict and mindfulness as moderators.
    Saavedra MC; Chapman KE; Rogge RD
    J Fam Psychol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):380-90. PubMed ID: 20731484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes.
    Campbell L; Simpson JA; Boldry JG; Rubin H
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Jul; 99(1):14-31. PubMed ID: 20565183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Helping each other grow: romantic partner support, self-improvement, and relationship quality.
    Overall NC; Fletcher GJ; Simpson JA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1496-513. PubMed ID: 20858888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicit negative evaluations about ex-partner predicts break-up adjustment: the brighter side of dark cognitions.
    Fagundes CP
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Jan; 25(1):164-73. PubMed ID: 21432664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partner schemas and relationship functioning: a states of mind analysis.
    Chatav Y; Whisman MA
    Behav Ther; 2009 Mar; 40(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 19187816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Caught in a bad romance: perfectionism, conflict, and depression in romantic relationships.
    Mackinnon SP; Sherry SB; Antony MM; Stewart SH; Sherry DL; Hartling N
    J Fam Psychol; 2012 Apr; 26(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 22353007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: a double dissociation in predictive validity.
    Eastwick PW; Eagly AH; Finkel EJ; Johnson SE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Nov; 101(5):993-1011. PubMed ID: 21767032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Organization of partner knowledge: relationship outcomes and longitudinal change.
    Showers CJ; Zeigler-Hill V
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1198-210. PubMed ID: 15359022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlates of partner violence for incarcerated women and men.
    Robertson K; Murachver T
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 May; 22(5):639-55. PubMed ID: 17429027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing implicit motivational orientations in couple relationships: the Partner-Related Agency and Communion Test (PACT).
    Hagemeyer B; Neyer FJ
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Mar; 24(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 21787092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive and negative romantic relationship quality: age, familiarity, attachment and well-being as correlates of couple agreement and projection.
    Zimmer-Gembeck MJ; Ducat W
    J Adolesc; 2010 Dec; 33(6):879-90. PubMed ID: 20843545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The importance of the organization of partner knowledge in understanding perceptions of relationship quality and conflict resolution behavior in married couples.
    Campbell L; Butzer B; Wong J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):723-40. PubMed ID: 18413305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positive and negative characteristics of marital interaction and their association with marital satisfaction in middle-aged and older couples.
    Henry NJ; Berg CA; Smith TW; Florsheim P
    Psychol Aging; 2007 Sep; 22(3):428-41. PubMed ID: 17874945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implicit attitudes in sexuality: gender differences.
    Geer JH; Robertson GG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Dec; 34(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 16362251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech Is Silver, Nonverbal Behavior Is Gold: How Implicit Partner Evaluations Affect Dyadic Interactions in Close Relationships.
    Faure R; Righetti F; Seibel M; Hofmann W
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1731-1741. PubMed ID: 30226792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship satisfaction in women: a longitudinal case-control study about the role of breast cancer, personal assertiveness, and partners' relationship-focused coping.
    Hinnen C; Hagedoorn M; Ranchor AV; Sanderman R
    Br J Health Psychol; 2008 Nov; 13(Pt 4):737-54. PubMed ID: 17999780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How large are actor and partner effects of personality on relationship satisfaction? The importance of controlling for shared method variance.
    Orth U
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1359-72. PubMed ID: 23798373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Satisfaction with a romantic relationship, depression, support and conflict.
    Cramer D
    Psychol Psychother; 2004 Dec; 77(Pt 4):449-61. PubMed ID: 15588454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hostility, emotional expression, and hemodynamic responses to laboratory stressors: reactivity attenuating effects of a tendency to express emotion interpersonally.
    Kline KA; Fekete EM; Sears CM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Jun; 68(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 18279986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.