These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20483846)

  • 1. Are some features easier to bind than others? The congruency effect.
    Goldfarb L; Treisman A
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 20483846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual distinctiveness and the development of children's false memories.
    Howe ML
    Child Dev; 2008; 79(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 18269509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Stroop-like effect in color-naming of color-word lexigrams by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodyte).
    Beran MJ; Washburn DA; Rumbaugh DM
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 17503696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.
    Bugg JM; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):433-49. PubMed ID: 22845037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.
    Schmidt JR; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):514-23. PubMed ID: 18444752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition.
    Graf M; Kaping D; Bülthoff HH
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 15733202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.
    Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):851-60. PubMed ID: 21517220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feature binding across different visual dimensions.
    Ward R; Arend I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1406-15. PubMed ID: 22688495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: an event-related fMRI study.
    Kaufmann L; Koppelstaetter F; Delazer M; Siedentopf C; Rhomberg P; Golaszewski S; Felber S; Ischebeck A
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):888-98. PubMed ID: 15808989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implicit task sets in task switching?
    Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J; Bereby-Meyer Y; Shahar N
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):913-27. PubMed ID: 25420632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):135-50. PubMed ID: 21936655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociating response conflict from numerical magnitude processing in the brain: an event-related fMRI study.
    Ansari D; Fugelsang JA; Dhital B; Venkatraman V
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):799-805. PubMed ID: 16731007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.
    van Dam WO; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1184-92. PubMed ID: 20718565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constraints on the observation of partial match costs: implications for transfer-appropriate processing approaches to immediate priming.
    Leboe JP; Leboe LC; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):634-48. PubMed ID: 20515194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual conflict-induced late positive complex in a modified Stroop task.
    Li G; Wang S; Duan Y; Zhu Z
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 May; 542():76-80. PubMed ID: 23416898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Influence of typical size of objects in a categorization task].
    Ferrier L; Staudt A; Reilhac G; Jiménez M; Brouillet D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 18266507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.