BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20483862)

  • 1. Contact sensitization in patients with lower extremity dermatitis in the South Moravian region, Czech Republic.
    Necas M; Dastychová E
    Phlebology; 2010 Jun; 25(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 20483862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The current spectrum of contact sensitization in patients with chronic leg ulcers or stasis dermatitis - new data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK).
    Erfurt-Berge C; Geier J; Mahler V
    Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Sep; 77(3):151-158. PubMed ID: 28194803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The most frequent allergens in allergic contact dermatitis].
    Oppel T; Schnuch A
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2006 Jul; 131(28-29):1584-9. PubMed ID: 16823706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patch testing with fine fragrances: comparison with fragrance mix, balsam of Peru and a fragrance series.
    Trattner A; David M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Dec; 49(6):287-9. PubMed ID: 15025700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Propolis-induced contact allergy].
    Schuler TM; Frosch PJ
    Hautarzt; 1988 Mar; 39(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 2967807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The significance of fragrance mix, balsam of Peru, colophony and propolis as screening tools in the detection of fragrance allergy.
    Wöhrl S; Hemmer W; Focke M; Götz M; Jarisch R
    Br J Dermatol; 2001 Aug; 145(2):268-73. PubMed ID: 11531790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Propolis, Colophony, and Fragrance Cross-Reactivity and Allergic Contact Dermatitis.
    Shi Y; Nedorost S; Scheman L; Scheman A
    Dermatitis; 2016; 27(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 27172306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contact dermatitis in the West of Scotland.
    Husain SL
    Contact Dermatitis; 1977 Dec; 3(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 580079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Allergic contact dermatitis and changes in the frequency of the causative allergens demonstrated with patch testing in 2008-2012.
    Tichy M; Karlova I
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2015 Sep; 159(3):480-8. PubMed ID: 24881589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Epicutaneous testing with a standard series. Results in 12,026 patients].
    Enders F; Przybilla B; Ring J; Burg G; Braun-Falco O
    Hautarzt; 1988 Dec; 39(12):779-86. PubMed ID: 2976753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A high prevalence of sensitization still persists in leg ulcer patients: a retrospective series of 106 patients tested between 2001 and 2002 and a meta-analysis of 1975-2003 data.
    Machet L; Couhé C; Perrinaud A; Hoarau C; Lorette G; Vaillant L
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 May; 150(5):929-35. PubMed ID: 15149505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Patch testing and nickel allergy].
    Hansen SR; Kroon S
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Feb; 128(4):433-5. PubMed ID: 18274576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous reactions to phenol-formaldehyde resins colophony/hydroabietyl alcohol and balsam of Peru/perfume mixture.
    Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Feb; 14(2):119-20. PubMed ID: 3709149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Contact allergy for perfume ingredients in cosmetics and toilet articles].
    de Groot AC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Mar; 141(12):571-4. PubMed ID: 9190522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Changes in the European baseline series from 1981 to 2011 in a French dermatology-allergology centre].
    Schoeffler A; Waton J; Latarche C; Poreaux C; Cuny JF; Schmutz JL; Barbaud A
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2013; 140(8-9):499-509. PubMed ID: 24034634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The frequency of contact allergy in children and adolescents in the Czech Republic.
    Machovcova A
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2012; 20(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 22726278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of shaving method on perfume allergy.
    Edman B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Nov; 31(5):291-2. PubMed ID: 7867325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults.
    Schäfer T; Böhler E; Ruhdorfer S; Weigl L; Wessner D; Filipiak B; Wichmann HE; Ring J
    Allergy; 2001 Dec; 56(12):1192-6. PubMed ID: 11736749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitization to propolis in 1255 children undergoing patch testing.
    Giusti F; Miglietta R; Pepe P; Seidenari S
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004; 51(5-6):255-8. PubMed ID: 15606649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate contact reactions to fragrance mix constituents and Myroxylon pereirae resin.
    Tanaka S; Matsumoto Y; Dlova N; Ostlere LS; Goldsmith PC; Rycroft RJ; Basketter DA; White IR; Banerjee P; McFadden JP
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 15291827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.